Ok, C gives enough rope to hang yourself... while C++ gives you enough rope to shot in your foot.
However think about it:
* Plenty of functionalities, libraries and stuff;
* Binary compatibility (through C) with pascal and fortran;
* Real threading thanks to pthread;
* High level abstraction based on closures;
* Function nesting;
* High performance garbage collector (#include <gcoll.h>)
Who needs another language?
* people who develop for platforms that don't have a c or sepples compiler
* people who want to write ENTERPRISE shits
* klingons
>>12 uses ``valid'' to try to sound smart
Sorry, did I hurt your feelings that the only thing preventing sepples from being the canonical shit language is that it's too complicated to serve as a definition?
>>14
when you make a fool of yourself and say sepples is a shit language at the same time, people are likely to think that everyone who says sepples is a shit language is an idiot like you.
>>14
Not only was that my first post in this thread, but I wasn't trying to sound smart (you misquoted there), merely saying that you have to be less lazy here when trying to make a point.
You're also clearly too new here to understand that when you say C++ is shit on /prog/, you are entirely preaching to the converted.