Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Django

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 16:05

What is /prog/'s opinion of django ?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 16:06

Boba's faggot dad.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 16:22

meh

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 17:03

Django, Django, Django, Django, Django daikazoku~

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 17:03

better than rails

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 17:24

I have built websights all my life, but never understood the point of webframeworks. Screw that shit, just use whatever libraries and tools make sense, no need abstract already simple things.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-10 17:44

Pro: its components work well together and make it a fertile ground for code/library sharing.
Con: its components aren't the bee's knees.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-11 2:56

Django was a master. One of the best guitarists ever,and for only having two fingers on his fretboard hand. Simply amazing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-11 5:58

>>8
And he was Belgian, just like Xarn.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-11 6:53

>>6
The point is to send more bills every month

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-11 15:10

Django is great if you want to do *exactly* the things it's designed for, and nothing else. If you try to deviate even slightly from the framework, it will give you absolute hell. Our production version of Django had a series of patches you had to apply to the normal version just to get in some basic functionality that wasn't supported.

Try Pylons instead. I haven't used it; apparently there is more supporting code to write, but it's a lot more flexible.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-11 17:50

>>11
I was going to write a comment like this in the morning but I got lazy and left it half baked.

It's getting better over time but they original philosophy remains, just use our whole framework or we will chase your riding the pink pony.

Ridiculous

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-27 15:35


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List