/prog/ - smoke vim everyday

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 19:17

it makes emacs less annoying

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:13

i just mount the drive on my mac and use my favorite text editor! emacs and vim are so 2005

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:20

>>2
Do you stream some screencasts occasionally?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:21

>>3
what?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:04

>>2,3
...

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:09

>>3
I combust and inhale screencasts at least once every full Earth rotation.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 22:54

>>6
you're not clever, though you probably think you are

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 3:31

nano and gedit were here, vim/emacs are gigantic faggots

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 4:13

kate says hi

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 6:18

Man I like Notepad++

I know that gets me zero credit around here but I honestly give zero fucks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 9:44

GIVE ZERO FUCKS TO MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

>>7
how can you be sure you're more clever than me to be able to appreciate my cleverness?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

Cream says hi.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:49

>>10
Notepad++ is pretty good, but doesn't handle lispy syntax (i.e. hyphen in tokens) very well. That's why when I'm writing my SICP programs in newLISP, I use jEdit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 11:19

>>14
newLISP
SICP
newLISP is dynamically scoped, while SICP teaches using Scheme which is lexically scoped, and they make use of closures quite a bit, something which newLISP can't do without extra hacking.
Languages like Scheme, Common Lisp, Haskell, O'Caml, ML would be much better suited for going through SICP than newLISP.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:22

>>15
what question you trying to answer with this post i don't even

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:24

>>16
You're a total idiot, go back to /b/, please.
I'm writing my SICP programs in newLISP
Scheme, Common Lisp, Haskell, O'Caml, ML would be much better suited for going through SICP than newLISP

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:06

>>17
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:18

>>18
PROGRAMMING DISCUSSION ON /prog/ IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:22

>>19
go back to /b/
triggered
>>18's incontinence

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:26

>>18
/Polecat Kebabs./

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:28

>>15
and they make use of closures quite a bit
You shouldn't call them closures; Sussman agreed, don't bother him about it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:17

>>8
dohoho noob tier solutions!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:38

>>23
back to /b/. p/ease.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 23:10

>>20-21,24
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 5:17

man ed

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:38

>>25
Lead by example.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:58

>>27
LEAD MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 10:39

>>28
ANUS MY LEAD

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 15:23

>>27 see >>25

smoke vim everyday

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 19:17

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:13

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:20

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:21

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:04

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:09

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 22:54

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 3:31

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 4:13

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 6:18

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 9:44

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:49

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 11:19

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:22

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:24

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:06

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:18

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:22

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:26

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:28

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:17

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:38

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 23:10

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 5:17

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:38

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:58

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 10:39

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 15:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 19:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 20:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 21:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 22:54

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 3:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 4:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 6:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 9:44

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:05

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 10:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 11:19

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 15:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:26

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 17:28

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 20:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 23:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 5:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 7:58

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 10:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-02 15:23