/prog/ - Gentoo, Arch or ?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:03

Which one?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

Arch, Gentoo has fallen way behind.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

If you want to play with PC try Gentoo. If you want to work on PC try Arch.
But it is better to try both of them, you will see which one is better choice for you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:10

>>3

Already tried both (long time ago). I think Arch has developed to be a much better system unlike Gentoo. Actually I wanted to know if there is currently a better distro than both?! Something one can work with easily but that is still fairly powerful (no Ubuntu, no LFS).

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:15

in before gobo linux advocate

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:19

If you want to compile everything by hand, go with Gentoo.
If you want a system with no man pages, go with Arch.
If you want a computer that you can actually work on, get a Mac.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:20

Arch still doesn't have a secure package manager.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:21

>>4

I have no idea what you are looking for. There are various and planty linux distributions and everything is up to you. You can choose whatever you want, feel free to do it...

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:22

>>6

>Mac

MAC MY ANUS

Seriously go fuck yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:24

lol everything just works

----------
posted from my iWank

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:32

>>6
Arch has no man pages? Mine seem fine. Explain yourself, troll!

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:39

>>11
I just hope that you stopped reading right there; you would know that YHBT if you had read the last line of that post.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 17:33

Running Arch here, feels good man.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 18:04

>>13
the pleasure of being arched inside

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:12

If you want to install three packages for every piece of software in order to get all the necessary files for it, use Debian.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:47

>>15
There are a lot of legitimate reasons to hate Debian, but if that's the best you can come up with, you aren't qualified to even be in the discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 20:47

>>16
There are?

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 21:02

>>17
Yes

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:32

>>16
For one, Debian is a communist distribution

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:48

CentOS, for those who have lives and thus can't be bothered to fix problems every update (which is continuous for Arch and Gentoo) or every six months (Ubuntu, Fedora)...

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:52

>>20
And the ``ent'' stands for ENTERPRISE, so you know it's rock solid

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 23:48

>>21
rock solid
You know, I never got that expression. Pumice is a rock. Most rocks aren't particularly solid.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 1:35

>>22
you would cry if I threw most rocks at your face
rock solid makes sense

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 4:15

>>22
Mountains are made of rock. You often need explosives such as dynamite to get through it. There are many solid mountains.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 5:24

>>24
YHBT(OHNWS)

Gentoo, Arch or ?

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:03

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:10

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:15

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:19

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:21

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:22

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:24

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:32

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:39

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 17:33

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 18:04

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:12

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:47

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 20:47

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 21:02

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:32

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:48

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:52

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 23:48

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 1:35

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 4:15

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 5:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:03

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:19

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 16:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 17:33

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 18:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 19:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 20:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 21:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 22:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-23 23:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 1:35

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 4:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-24 5:24