>>3
I don't think someone who's too lazy to depress his shift key when needed can legitimately berate someone else, even someone as worthless as >>1, over laziness.
>>4
i don't think someone who's too lazy to learn about the history of writing can legitimately berate someone else, even someone as worthless as >>3, over laziness.
>>7
if by "thoroughly trounced" you mean ignored by you and pushed off the front page by shitposts once it became clear to everyone that you were wrong, then sure.
>>9 http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1276615814/45 was just you putting your fingers in your ears and going ``BLAH BLAH I CAN'T HEAR YOU, NOTHING YOU SAY IS A VALID COUNTER-ARGUMENT!". why would i bother replying to that? if you want to make a serious reply to http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1276615814/44, i'll gladly prove you wrong again, just like i did with that post.