Fucking why?
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 18:54
Why don't you hipsters use the conventional [quote][/quote] for quoting?
2
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-20 19:00
because [quote]ihbt[/quote]
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 19:11
[span class="quote"]>??[/span]
4
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-20 19:12
{quote BBCode is {i poorly defined}.}
5
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-20 19:13
[quote = Dq]>wtf[/quote]
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 19:16
>>5
[quote = "Rt"]>g[/quote]
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 19:26
If it comes down to conventional standards, the implication sign (>) is the traditionally accepted prefix for quoted e-mail and BBS messages from time immemorial1 .
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 19:28
[quote] {quote BBCode is {i poorly defined}.} [/quote]
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-20 19:43
// ?
10
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-20 22:26
>>7
You seem to have confused > and ⊢.
11
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-20 23:00
implication sign I have laughed
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-06-21 14:15
Isn't it [quote][/quote] or what?
13
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-21 14:22
Isn't it [quote][/quote] or what?
14
Name:
sage 2010-06-21 16:12
>>13
No, it isn't what.
No
>>14
>>13 No, it isn't what. No
A ways to go yet, hey?
16
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-21 20:07
>>15
Damn, better than I feared, but still not perfect.
17
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-21 20:11
this isn't vbulletin.
18
Name:
Anonymous 2010-06-21 20:50
>>17
At least you didn't say phpBB.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2013-01-19 21:01
/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.