/prog/ - Read the OP's post

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:24

Good, I wish to teach my self a good gui language so what do you recommend ?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:31

XML

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

I recommend you #include <windows.h>
This is actually a bad idea.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

Beginner level - HTML, Javascript
Intermediate Level - Java
Advanced Level - C (Win32 etc)
Expert Level - Write your own GUI using OpenGL (C or C++)

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:42

web - javascript/css/html
any MS platform - c#/wpf/silverlight
game - opengl/directx
linux or multiplatform - qt
android, iphone, mac, etc.. - native tools

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:45

C with Xlib

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:51

C with Allegro.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:59

visual basic

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 2:48

C with Curses.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:14

>>1
GUI
good

how am i supposed to understand this?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:21

>>9
I second this

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:28

>>10
Buy a Mac.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:30

>>12
sorry, im not an queer.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:49

>>13
Don't believe the ads, I've seen quite a few mac users with rather hairy necks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:54

>>14
doesnt mean that they are not queers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:14

LabVIEW, Qt framework

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:15

>>15
I believe most of them are virgins.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:17

>>14
Then those would be the Mac users making use of its Unix foundation. But if you're going to use OS X (while I agree is a nice OS in its own right) for that purpose, why not just cut out the Apple fluff and install FreeBSD or something?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:52

>>18
OS X uses a different kernel, and launchd.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 6:08

>>19
It's still built on mostly a Unix foundation. You have projects like fink and whatnot, but if you're going to bother will all that, why not just install a BSD? It would seem to make much more sense.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 7:29

>>20
There is no such thing as a "UNIX foundation". There is/are a UNIX standard/s and OS X openly adheres to them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:02

>>20
It doesn't make any sense. Why give up most of the capabilities I have just to, uh, retain a few I already have?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:32

Why do you morons have to start this thread every god damn week?

Name: >>20 2010-05-28 12:06

>>21
There is no such thing as a "UNIX foundation". There is/are a UNIX standard/s
Oh sorry. I made a mistake on the proper terminology.

and OS X openly adheres to them.
Right, and I respect that and all, but if you're just going to use OS X mostly for its Unix standards and not much else, what's the point?

>>22
Well, if you use OS X more than just for its Unix standards, then okay.

>>23
Because they've lost their way to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:38

>>20
some people actually like launchd and microkernels.

>>21
it doesn't adhere to this: http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/vi.html
proof that the open group is making the name UNIX by selling certification to anyone with deep enough pockets, regardless of whether they comply with standards or not.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:55

>>25
s/UNIX/UNIX meaningless/s

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 15:57

>>25
and DTrace, thank you Sun.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 19:18

>>25
proof that the open group is making the name UNIX by selling certification to anyone with deep enough pockets, regardless of whether they comply with standards or not.
Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-29 6:47

>>25
/usr/bin/vi is a symlink to vim, so what's the problem?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 1:23

>>29
vim does not fully comply with the standard for ex/vi. read the fucking standard:
http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ex.html
http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/vi.html

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:06

>>2
this

Programming languages are good for defining procedures, not interfaces.

Use some gui builder that exports xml (like glade) and then use whatever fucking language is best suited to what it is your actually trying to proceduralize (and has libglade)

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:29

If you didnt learn coding before 18 give up

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:58

If you didn't write an ANSI C compiler when you were 12 give up

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:04

>>33

　　　 ∧＿∧　／￣￣￣￣￣
　　   （´∀｀）＜　Your gay
　　   （　　）   ＼＿＿＿＿＿
　　   ｜｜　|
　　（＿_）＿）

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:45

>>30
I bet you can't even list the differences between vim's ex/vi-modes and the real thing though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:21

>>35
i can, but i don't have to because someone already did it for me: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/vi_diff.html#posix-compliance

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:51

COMPLY WITH MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 16:44

>24
What about my gay?

Name: >>24 2010-05-30 16:53

>>38
I didn't mention it

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 1:42

As per usual, post 40 is the best post in the thread.

http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Grapefruit

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 7:58

>>40
AS PER MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 6:21

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:

Entire Thread Thread List

Read the OP's post

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:24

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:31

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:42

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:45

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:51

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 2:48

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:14

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:21

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:28

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:30

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:49

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:54

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:14

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:15

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:17

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:52

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 6:08

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 7:29

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:02

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:32

24 Name: >>20 2010-05-28 12:06

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:38

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:55

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 15:57

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 19:18

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-29 6:47

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 1:23

31 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:06

32 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:29

33 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:58

34 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:04

35 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:45

36 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:21

37 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:51

38 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 16:44

39 Name: >>24 2010-05-30 16:53

40 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 1:42

41 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 7:58

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 6:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 1:59

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 2:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:28

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:30

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 3:54

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 4:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 5:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 6:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 7:29

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 11:32

Name: >>20 2010-05-28 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 14:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 15:57

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-28 19:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-29 6:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 1:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:29

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 3:58

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 4:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 5:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-30 16:44

Name: >>24 2010-05-30 16:53

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 1:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-31 7:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 6:21