>>43
"Try to avoid"? I could understand that it may be of little consequence to you that an API is simple and well-documented, but to
avoid it for that is nonsensical. Much less that you would want to avoid low latency or good quality mixing different streams with different sample rates.
Oh and did I mention that each application gets a separate volume control? Kickass feature.
And OpenAL works fine with OSS, I'm not sure how you say it's unsuitable. Regardless, I brought up OSS in regards to all the silly comments about PulseAudio, not necessarily because it had anything to do with
>>1.