/prog/ - If you hate FIOC so much

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 15:17

Why dont you write a python clone with it removed?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 15:20

Why do you think we hate FIOC?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:02

>>2
One word

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:14

>>3
⁶⁶Anus⁹⁹

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:21

>>4
I chuckled

>>1
We dont hate FIOC/nobody on /prog/ can program let alone write a language

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:23

>>5
My dozen or so toy interpreters beg to differ.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:28

forced haxing of anii?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:48

>>4

You have a problem, get counselling

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:56

>>5
This may surprise you but I invented the ``no-one on /prog/ can code meme''

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:57

>>8
This our therapy

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 17:54

Then it would be called ``generic scripting language''. Significant whitespace is its only distinguishing feature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 18:25

>>11
When your category includes both Perl and Scheme, I don't think you can legitimately speak of a conceptually ``generic'' member.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 3:17

>>9
you can't invent the truth

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 4:17

>>13
I don't see why not, you just invented a lie.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:14

>>9

This may surprise you, but I invented the "This may surprise you meme" meme.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:45

>>15

That doesn't surprise me in the least, which means you couldn't have come up with the meme; therefore it surprises me and you did come up with it! Gasp!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:53

>>16
That's not even close to how logic works.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 12:44

>>17
circular logic works that way

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 12:53

>>18
This may surprise you
is easily re-phrased, with no ill effects for the meaning of the sentence, as:
This may not surprise you
Thus the rest of your logic, circular or otherwise, is flawed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 13:27

>>19
This will surprise you, but you have reloaded /prog/ 51,638 times since you first came here.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 13:31

>>18
No it doesn't, idiot. The surprise and the fact of invention are completely independent. Hence the use of ``but'' as a conjunction rather than something like ``therefore''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 14:46

>>21
This C++ may surprise you but NullPointerException

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 14:55

>>15
This may surprise you, but I invented the ``This may surprise you, but I invented the ``This may surprise you'' meme'' meme

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:03

>>23
>>19
>>15
>>9
Noam Chomsky is turning over in his grave. inb4

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:05

>>23
This may surprise you, but I invented the ``This may surprise you, but I invented the ``This may surprise you, but I invented the ``This may surprise you'' meme'' meme'' meme

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:08

This may surprise you but i invented the "i invented that meme" meme.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 16:08

>>21
I'm going out on a limb here but I think You have been beet rolled

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 16:10

>>24
This may surprise others, but you didn't optimize your ^B_BCODE.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 18:01

>>28
I have it compiled for ^MI_PS

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 18:17

{{u}I} use my {{b}very own {{{u}{i}{o}}MARKUP SCHEME}} that I {{i}cross-compile} to {{{u}{o}{m}}{{sup}B}{{sub}B}CODE}

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 5:29

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:

Entire Thread Thread List

If you hate FIOC so much

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 15:17

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 15:20

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:02

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:14

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:21

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:23

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:28

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:48

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:56

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 16:57

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 17:54

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 18:25

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 3:17

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 4:17

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:14

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 11:53

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 12:44

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 12:53

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 13:27

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 13:31

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 14:46

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 14:55

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:03

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:05

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 15:08

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 16:08

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 16:10

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 18:01

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 18:17

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 5:29