How do I send large amounts of data (around 700 MB or so, can be larger) totally anonymous to its destination?
I'll be using Tor for two way communications.
But Tor is slow, I do not care that much for packet loss since it's a multimedia stream.
I do require speeds higher than 250 kb/s though.
So, how can I stream my anus porndata while staying Anonymous?
In a few years, IP spoofing will be impossible, I want a long term solution.
>>2 has the right idea, but can be improved.
Write it to magnetic tape, send it by air mail. If it takes two days to get to a given location and you send 10 1-TB tapes per package, you'll have a throughput of nearly 500 Mb/sec.
>>8
Not to mention that it's probably cheaper than sending it over the Internet if your audience is elsewhere in the US, and there are laws protecting the secrecy of your data.
>>7
I don't see how using a botnet would be more secure than Tor, because it wouldn't be. It might be faster, but certainly not more secure than using a simple proxy server. As for the amount of work, I believe one could compromise a few dozen servers in a few hours by googling for vulnerable PHP scripts (thank PHP web developers for their trivially exploitable bugs!).
As for my answer: >>1
You can't have all the best of 3 world - realtime speed, anonymity and security. I2P or Tor might be good choices for what you need. You might be able to tweak these services to lower their security for speed gains, but they're usually aimed at preserving data. If you want something UDP-based, you'll have to make it yourself or search the internet, maybe someone else did it before you.
I've also forgotten about Anonymous P2P. If it's something meant for more than one person, you could try something like Japanese P2P's like Perfect Dark. The peers there are very high-speed and the most common files there are 2-4gb archives of BDs and .ts HDTV captures.
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-23 14:07
>>9 laws protecting the secrecy of your data
HAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHHHAHAHHAHHHHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHA
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-23 14:12
Sending it physically through postage sounds interesting. I suppose it depends on what those 700mb of data are. If it's indeed pornography or some form of copyright media, you'd be fine uploading it to any filesharing site or even uploading directly to your destination. Just remember to encrypt the contents. Also security through obscurity, name your 700mb of porn something like: "family_photos_07."
For more anonymity, use anonymous proxies. Go wardriving and piggyback some poor saps wireless router.
If it's something vitally important that you don't want anyone else viewing, physical mail sounds like a plan. Just hope no one deems it necessary to examine the parcel: "OH GOSH THIS MAN'S SENDING TERRORIST PLANS/ CHILD PORNOGRAPHY/ COPYRIGHT MEDIA." Don't use a return address (duh!).
The most secure way is to transport yourself or a physical proxy (friend) and deliver the contents by hand.
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-23 14:14
>>12
agreed... you're awfully naive if you believe there are corporate/ government laws protecting your secrecy.
>>1
if you want to send files to without anyone but the receiver knowing the contents then use steganography. but if you dont want anyone to know that you were the one who sent the files then wardriving(wlan hijacking) is the answer.
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-23 14:25
Burn it on the fucking CD and deliver the CD personally.
>>12,14
And Reddit isn't even down. Fucking children.
Regardless of whether you can physically stop people from opening your mail and looking at the contents of the tapes (and you're naïve if you think even the US government has the resources to open every parcel and have tape readers ready on the off chance someone is still mailing magnetic tape), the contents of the tape wouldn't be admissible as evidence in a court of law because post secret laws exist.
Regardless of how you look at it, sending information by postal mail is much safer than sending it over the Internet.
If you really think you're the center of the universe and The Man is just champing at the bit for an opportunity to snoop through your loli animay archives, you can always encrypt it.
>>16
Steganography without encryption is always terrible advice. And if you have encryption, you might as well drop the steganography, because encrypted data is so common on the Internet that it's not going to attract any attention.
>>18
PATRIOT Act you bleating moron. And he didn't specify the nature of the data he wants to send (if it's anus porn, he wouldn't bother posting on /prog/ about it).
>>20
You mean the act that doesn't actually say what you Redditor conspiracy theorists want it to say? Take your fact-free whining back to your social news aggregator.
Fine then, we'll see who's right in a few years. When you'll end up being forced to disclose your encryption key to your data even without the necessity of a warrant on their side, remember me. I will be laughing.
>>26
Why would I remember you? This discussion was about something completely different.
You looked up what the PATRIOT act actually says and discovered you were wrong, so now you're trying to move the goalposts? It must be nice when your opponents exist entirely in your head and you can just pretend you win every debate regardless of how incredibly wrong you are.
Name:
262010-05-23 15:53
>>27 You looked up what the PATRIOT act actually says and discovered you were wrong
Not at all, I'm sorry if I gave off the impression of backing off on that claim. Legal, unlimited wiretapping is certainly a nice step in the right direction, don't you think so? You can almost see a next step that would be to give the ordinary police forces the same authority. Just look at the nice laws they've put up in the UK relative to encryption. It can only go one way in the future, so it's just a matter of time. If you think there are no private interests wanting to get such a nice control on information, you're an idiot. If you think the population is going to do as much as lift a finger against whatever measures are taken, you're an idiot. It must feel nice to think your opponents don't exist and you can just pretend you win every debate regardless of how incredibly wrong you are.
>>29
See the post that sparked the entire discussionshitstorm >>9: Not to mention that it's probably cheaper than sending it over the Internet if your audience is elsewhere in the US, and there are laws protecting the secrecy of your data.
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-23 16:16
Jesus Fucking Christ.
OP Here.
It will be Warez, lots of it.
All I want is the end point not to know where it's coming from.
>>46
Hi Jane. You've got nothing on me anyway, as I saw you sucking the boss's cock in the break room. Enjoy trying to find work in this economy, you little slut! Bye.
>>47
Hi Bob. You've got nothing on me anyway, as I saw you sucking the boss's cock in the break room. Enjoy trying to find work in this economy, you little slut! Bye.