Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

SIJS tripcodes do not work on text-boards!

Name: !IHtxye1bVU 2010-05-22 7:15

#f滕;嬶8「 = !Homosex0GY on the image-boards. On the text-boards, it doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 7:16

>SJIS
I meant.

Name: !IHtxye1bVU 2010-05-22 7:44

Obvious tripcode testing is obvious

Name: !Gaysexl0yc 2010-05-22 8:51

Use this instead: #?wB/9itC

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 8:58

>>3
back to tautology club, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 9:11

>>5
back to goatkcd, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 12:25

really?

Name: tre !zpAaSWRxxA 2010-05-22 15:43

eq

Name: !KwOJRBWOVE 2010-05-22 19:30

SJIS TRIPCODE

Probably doesn't work here.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 19:30

well, at least sjis trips work on my text board

Name: !Gaysexl0yc 2010-05-22 19:31

>>4
oh...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 20:02

>>10
Go back to bed, Trevor.
Anyway, they'll work here too, if you translate them to the appropriate UTF-8 characters. The tripcode algorithm is defined for bytestreams, not encodings.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 20:08

>>12
I'm not Trevor. I'm a free agent who codes his own text boards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 20:08

>>12
The tripcode algorithm is defined for bytestreams, not encodings.
*nods*
As is should be

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 20:15

>>12
not all shift-jis strings are valid utf-8 strings, even if you ignore the 8th bit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-22 22:21

>>15
Doesn't have to be valid to use it. Shiitchan isn't smart enough to filter invalid bytes.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:17

SJIS
Pronounced 'si-jiss'

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:21

>>17

How can I trust you?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:27

>>16
It doesn't matter when your browser filters out invalid ones before it sends the request... Unless you're one of those GNAA/Anti-Free wget users.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:34

>>19
So whose fault is it when you use a broken browser?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:42

>>20
any browser that claims to be sending utf-8 and then sends data that is not valid utf-8 is broken.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 1:52

>>21
Oh? You claim to be sending English, but you clearly aren't, because you don't understand the rules of capitalisation. Are you broken? I would say yes, but you clearly disagree. Hypocrite.

HTTP POST does not support typeless bytestreams for individual fields, so this must be seen as work-around around a broken area of the protocol. The browser isn't broken, it's enhanced by understanding and acknowledging the realities of how the protocol is used in the wild.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 3:03

>>22
Most writing systems (such as those used in Georgian, Glagolitic, Arabic, Hebrew, and Devanagari) make no distinction between capital and lowercase letters, a system called unicase. Indeed, even European languages did not make this distinction before about 1300; both majuscule and minuscule letters existed, but a given text would use either one or the other.
clearly, you are french. because only a frenchman would make such an idiotic mistake.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 3:10

>>23
English rules of capitalisation
OH BUT OTHER LANGUAGES WAH WAH WAH
Moron.
The case distinction in sensible languages happened because proper capitalisation was technically superior. You, on the other hand, are trying to draw attention to yourself by ignoring centuries of sensibility not because you have a valid point to make, but because you have no actual skills by which to distinguish yourself otherwise.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 3:12

>>24
excuse me, mr. technically superior. why don't you take that capitalization of yours and shove it right up your boat.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 3:31

capitalize my anus

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 5:16

>>24
take your ``carolingian miniscule" and shove it up your cul. do you think being newer automatically makes things better? that's been disproven more times than anyone can count: sepples/c, perl/php, perl/ruby, r4rs/r5rs, r5rs/r6rs...

also, [spoiler]http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cul#French = proof that all french people are gay. why else would they make the same word mean ``anus" and ``sex"?[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 11:03

>>27
take your ``BBCode failure" and shove it up your cul. do you think being better automatically makes things better? that's been disproven more times than anyone can count: sepples/c, perl/php, perl/ruby, r4rs/r5rs, r5rs/r6rs...

also, [spoiler]http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cul#French = proof that all french people are gay. why else would they make the same word mean ``anus" and ``sex"?[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-23 17:19

>>27
being newer
Putting words in your opponent's mouth is the only way you can pretend to win arguments, then, is it?

french
It actually took me a while to realise you were equating Charlemagne and the Carolingians with French people. That's some serious ignorance of basic history you've got going on there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 4:26

This is certainly a discussion that needed digging up. Thanks a lot, Michael Jordan.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 7:56

do you think being better automatically makes things better? that's been disproven more times than anyone can count: ... r4rs/r5rs,
That guy never did answer my question about why the R5RS is worse than the R4RS. Probably, because, like the Chicken guy, he doesn't actually have an argument.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 9:46

>>32
But he had r4rs on the bad side!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 10:04

>>33
I think you need to re-examine his post. "r4rs" is on the good side.
After reading this entire thread from the beginning, I'm beginning to suspect that this "carolingian miniscule" idiot is actually just an elaborate hoax invented by Xarn to troll us.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 10:46

>>34
But that makes no sense, it's on the same side as C++!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 12:41

>>34
How could it be a hoax? You have his posts here, in this very thread.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 17:09

>>35
That was clearly a typo as he explicitly specified newer was worse

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-25 23:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:37

Name: sage !IHtxye1bVU 2013-10-03 23:00

sage

Name: !UWAAAAAA.. 2013-10-03 23:18

sage

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 2:34

dubs

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-06 16:25

>>41
>>42
>le pedophile sage

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List