Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

regexml

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 12:04

http://code.google.com/p/regexml/

Regex XML for your Java needs

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 12:07

ExpressionFactory ef = new ExpressionFactory(new ClassPathResource("url_expression.xml"));
I vomited

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 13:52

<match equals="[0-9.\-A-Za-z@]" max="*" capture="true"/>

PIG DISGUSTING

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 14:18

<start/>
<end/>

Isn't this exactly the opposite to for what XML was intention?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 14:25

>>4
Isn't this exactly the opposite to for what XML was intention?
Isn't this the exact opposite to that for which grammar was intended?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 14:55

>>5
That's what I said. Isn't that the exactly intended for when XML grammars oppose?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 16:40

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 16:56

>>6
Lolwat
but no, XML is supposed to be well-structured, so <start /> is perfectly allowed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 16:57

>>8
Are you an retard!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 17:06

>>8
But surely they (start and end tags) are redundant
Disregard that. Just read the format, I thought it meant "start and end of expression" (which is, of course, stupid) - not "start and end of line".
Of course, these also be made redundant through the match tag, which appears to match word boundaries (so why not line boundaries?)

Overall, this seems to be a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Also XML is a very silly format to use for this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-06 18:09

>>8
It's legal, but that doesn't mean it isn't an exceptionally bad idea, above and beyond the use of XML itself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-07 6:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-07 23:00

I don't see what's so bad about it

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-08 7:23

>>13
Go back to /j2ee/.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List