Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

QWERTY or Colemack or Dvorak?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 20:06

You decide.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 20:09

QWERTY. No real advantage to the other two, and every computer I come into contact with is QWERTY.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 20:31

>>2
Enjoy your cramps, caveman.  Dvorak 4 lyfe.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 20:37

>>3
Enjoy your shitty placement of pretty much all the characters used for programming.
Colemak is the way to go if you want to do programming.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 20:45

AZERTY.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 21:41

As far as I can tell from just looking at it, Colemak is just a bastardization of QWERTY or QWERTY a bastardization of Colemak. QWERTY is incredibly common, but Colemak does have the benefit of making all of its home position keys be frequently-used (English) letters; QWERTY promotes the semi-colon, on the other hand, a frequent coding symbol in many languages (but I shouldn't need to point that out).

I'm looking at Dvorak ... specific left-hand or right-hand Dvorak setups appears to be a jumble of letters.  I don't see rhyme or reason.  Two-handed Dvorak seems to want to favor having one hand to handle all consonants and the other hand handle all vowels.  I don't see the logic or need of such an alphabetic abstraction (or dexterity specialization).

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 22:06

>>1
I have RSI, I use Colemack. Significantly better than QWERTY, but not that much better than Dvorak. And Dvorak has crappy placement of symbols.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 22:13

Vi's keybindings were designed for QWERTY. Use QWERTY.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 22:39

>>8
Or, you know, don't use vi

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 22:40

>>8
I couldn't have put a better case against QWERTY if I'd tried, thank you

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 23:00

>>8
Though I have been using Linux distributions for many years, I have never enjoyed using Vi for document editing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-04 23:36

>>8
This is also why I use QWERTY. Also, if you get too much in the habit of using alternative layouts, using other people's computers can be hell.

I just wish that the typewriter layout had never been ported to PCs (and while I'm at it, I wish that intel had been forced to break backwards compatibility).

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 0:22

Use the alphabetical order layout.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 3:27

QWERTY is universal, has been for over a century and a half. I doubt anything is going to truly change that.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 3:35

QWERTZ bitches. heil dem führer.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 3:36

TALIIBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 5:27

Colemak all the way down to CTS.

If you ever need to work on someone else’s computer, you can

  * switch to the Colemak layout in a matter of seconds (if said person is using a recent version of GNU/Linux, all of which include the Colemak layout) or,

  * just switch back to QWERTY by looking at the keyboard while you type, which makes you a little slower but works OK.

I’ve been using Colemak for more than a year now, and while I can’t express on Dvorak (never used it), I can say for sure that it’s way better than QWERTY.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 8:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 10:52

I use left handed Dvorak on my computers with the mouse permanently on the right hand. I am competent with the following layouts: Dvorak international, Colemak, QWERTY, Neo.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-05 11:17

while I can’t express on Dvorak (never used it), I can say for sure that it’s way better than QWERTY
This is how most opinions on /prog/ are formed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 1:57

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:30

Xarn is a bad boyfriend

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:26

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List