C++ compiler?

I'm sure you get these threads all the time....  I'm used to Dev C++ but I don't really feel comfortable using a program that hasn't been updated in years.  What compiler do you use?  I'm trying to find something that works with SDL as well.

I am using Haskell

>>1
http://www.sbcl.org/
http://code.google.com/p/lispbuilder/

I use clang. I don't know if it fully supports Sepples yet, but I don't care because I use the superior C99 language.

All Sepples compilers should work with libraries.
Perhaps Dev-C++ doesn't need updating LOL
Try the GNU compiler collection.

>>5
>Try the GNU compiler collection.

GCC is a good choice, I recommend it highly!

g++ is always a good pick, even if it's not always the best.  If you're going for zomg high performance, Intel C++ is probably the best, though you'll have to resort to evil ways to get a copy unless you've got a few hundred bucks lying around.  VC++ supposedly gets better performance than g++ on Windows, but it's probably not enough of a marked difference to notice, and visual anything installs 4GB of shit on the machine anyway.

Dev-C++ will probably work fine, unless you're trying something really new.

Why the cock would you use Sepples? SDL is a C library, write in C. Write in C.

>>7
GNU C++ is never a good pick, and it's never the best.

Intel C++ for Linux is freely downloadable for noncommercial use.

VC++ should be expected to have faster compile times with precompiled headers.  And if 4 GB of hard drive space means a lot to you, get a job and buy a bigger hard drive.

>>9
g++ is a good choice if you're targeting something other than x86/x86-64/ia-64/arm/sparc and need to use sepples (for example, if you won't get paid if you don't use sepples).

>>10
Only if there's no better compiler from the vendor... and often times there is, unless you need to use C++ features

>>9
I happen to know it outperforms the only official commercial compiler to target a certain widely deployed system, and it's the only other compiler adapted to do so.

>>12
Now you're pulling my appendage. Which appendage is it?

>>13
the penis?

>>11
for a lot of platforms, the vendor either doesn't provide a sepples compiler, or just gives you g++.

editor: gedit
compiler: gcc

>>7
Pilgrim's going to go to your house and fuck your shit up if a proggitor finds out

>>17
It looks like you need a buttsort.

>>9
Looks like someone still uses proprietary software. Besides, GCC is much faster in a bunch of areas, so saying it is never the best is bullshit. Stop pretending to know what you're talking about and learn to program fag.

>>19
Looks like someone still uses proprietary software.
^* Everyone

>>20
I don't, fag.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_(software)
>>20

>>19
You need to remember that today's GCC is huge and very convoluted. Don't expect it to compare well in some areas with other compilers that have smaller design scopes. Its outstanding feature is in the fact it works and it's free.

>>20
I don't either. I own a Sunblade 1500 and 100% of my software is free. I don't own anything else that I could consider to be proprietary software.

>>23
it works
Yeah, sure.

GNU is proprietary.

>>24
RMS/Free, I like it. Someone do up some interjection kopipe on the quick.

Anyway he did say free, not Free, so I think he's okay.

I burned my grilled cheese reading this thread. :(

>>27
How the hell does one manage preparing a grilled cheese sandwich while browsing the Internet?

>>27
We you using a propitiatory toaster?

I wonder if RMS walks into cafes and restaurants, and whines until he sees the recipes of all the food he is eating. "I DON'T WANT ANY PROPRIETARY CAKE!"

Secret sauce is the enemy of your freedom!

>>30
Software != cake. You don't blindly consume software at once. You care about where did the software came from, who did it, and what is licensed on. You wouldn't download a cake into your mouth from shady sites, would you?

>>32
http://cakephp.org/

God help us all.

I'm worried about your eating habits, >>32-chan. You should stop blindly consuming cakes you get from shady places that you don't even know precisely which. You might accidentally a cake made by a meth addict who had sex with it, and get some nasty STDs in your mouth.

>>24-26
The idea of the Free Software Movement is that computer users deserve the freedom to form a community. You should have the freedom to help yourself, by changing the source code to do whatever you need to do. And the freedom to help your neighbor, by redistributing copies of programs to other people. Also the freedom to help build your community, by publishing improved versions so that other people can use them.

You can do as you wish as long as all users retain all their essential freedoms.

GCC software permits anybody to form communities to cooperate, improve and share GCC thus making it free.

>>30
Cake isn't the same as software. The only thing that a customer needs to know are what ingredients are in the cake and possibly when it was baked. It makes little sense to try and modify an already completed cake. It makes better sense to modify the recipe for the cake rather than the completed cake.

Software is different. Software is a practical tool in the form of intangible knowledge. It makes a lot of sense for society to have the freedom to cooperate, study, improve and share software.

CakePHP enables PHP users at all levels to rapidly develop robust cooking applications.

DevC++ is not dead, its now wxDevC++
http://wxdsgn.sourceforge.net/

And if you use the Intel C++ compiler, you still will want an IDE for it unless you want to compile with make on the console. I think that CodeBlocks is the best option, you can use it with any C++ compiler

Recipes by themselves are not copyrightable anyway. Cake is free in ways that RMS's little mind has trouble handling.

Someone needs to make a Lazytown-RMS-dance video.

I'd do it, but I can't be fucked installing video editing software.

How about wxDev-C++ ??
I think thats still under development

>>40 Are you blind? Read >>37

>>38
You wouldn't apply a patent for cake.
You wouldn't sue for licensing fees on pie.
Think before you file a patent.

>>42
What world are you living in? There practically thousands of food patents. Here for e.g. cake related patents:
Cheese cake
United States Patent 4163806
An unbaked cheese cake is prepared by forming a mixture consisting essentially of cream cheese, non-dairy whipped topping and powdered sugar and refrigerating the mixture until firm to produce the cheese cake in final form without baking.

United States Patent 7698841

Abstract:
A versatile, animated cake decoration that can be used with a cake to celebrate various occasions such as birthdays, anniversaries, graduations and the like. The cake decoration can be partially embedded in the upper surface of the cake so as to simulate a face that has moving eyes and a moving mouth. The apparatus includes a battery that powers a mechanism that moves the eyes and the mouth and also powers a sound generator that can play a number of different songs and greetings to fit the celebration. The apparatus is safe and is constructed from non-toxic materials so it can safely be used on food products such as cake.

Self-topping cake
United States Patent 5215774
A mix for making a cake having at least two distinct layers in a microwave oven. The mix is formulated to form an unleavened topping and a leavened cake layer. The viscosity of the batter for the cake layer is adjusted relative to the viscosity of the batter for the topping layer so that a cake having two distinct layers is formed by baking the batters in a microwave oven.

Process for preparing a high quality, reduced-calorie cake
United States Patent 4431681
A process is disclosed for producing a high quality, 40% or greater calorie-reduced cake containing a moisture content of 40% or more on an as-consumed basis. The process involves preparing a batter formulation comprising from 40% to 65% water on a by weight basis, 5 to 30% cake flour, 0 to 25% sugar, 1 to 6% shortening, 0 to 10% egg white solids, 0.5 to 6% of a leavening agent, 0 to 2% of an emulsifier and 1 to 20% of a water binder which is either a gum, bulking agent or combination, adjusting the batter viscosity within the range of from 15,000 to 50,000 cps. as measured by a Brookfield Viscometer and baking at a temperature of from 300° F.-450° F. (149°-232° C.) for a time sufficient to produce a bake loss of from 5 to 20%.

United States Patent 4163806
"cheese cake" isn't real cake

United States Patent 7698841
definitely not a cake

United States Patent 5215774
United States Patent 4431681
invalid due to not being "non-obvious"

You wouldn't apply a patent for cake.
patents for cake
still arguing pointlessly

patents

C++
Cakes

entity *pAtEnt = &cake;