Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I am pretty much new

Name: Whhhggggaarrrrbbbbllleee 2010-03-31 1:42

Ok Well I'm a complete noob when it comes to computer prog. and I have a great desire to learn. I pretty much picked my language I want to start on (based on common goals) but I want your input.

I chose C for first language... Good Idea or no? O.o

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 2:44

>>11
Pascal is essentially a C dialect with some purely cosmetic syntax differences. Haskell, on the other hand, is basically the C++ template system, turned inside out and rebuilt  into a new language, from the ground up, by people who actually knew what they were doing.

You will not find a shorter explanation that does not contain trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 3:59

C is pretty good to start with. Whatever you do don't start with Java because then you will be confused by it's forced OOP style.
Also Python is great for learning

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 15:47

>>13
So, you would use Haskell over C++ for any object oriented programming you would have to do?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 15:57

>>15
yes

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 16:00

How the hell is Haskell even related to object-oriented programming in the way C++ does it? It's just more close to ML and has pattern matching, lazy evaluation and a bunch of other nice stuff, but I don't see how it's comparable to C++'s OO. Haskell may be a better choice for a lot of problems than C++, but I just don't see how it compares at all...

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 16:30

>>17
How the hell is Haskell even related to object-oriented programming in the way C++ does it
No-one said anything about doing it in the same way as C++, only if I would choose Haskell over C++ for OO.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 16:39

>>17
How the hell is C++ even related to doing object-oriented programming correctly?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 17:34

>>19
It's not, but I don't see how it's related to Haskell (commenting on >>13).

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 17:48

>>20
>>13 doesn't claim that Haskell has OO, only that Haskell is an improvement over C++s templates.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-02 20:50

>>21
WELL THEN >>13-SAN IS WRONG

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-03 0:56

I am pretty much jew

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-03 1:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-26 21:23

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List