why the fuck does perl have 10 000 operators and variables?
and just check out the list of core modules.
will perl6 fix this mess or will humanity be doomed to use this mess for the rest of its existence? its still better then c++, java, PHP, ruby and all that crap. is there anything that could kill perl without being shit?
will perl6 fix this mess
Yes, 2010 will be the year of perl6 on the desktop
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-29 17:37
Perl is poetry. It's a scripting language, not technically a programming language, and there are so many special variables to reflect that (by design) you cannot affect core behaviour through function calls. The core modules define the keywords of the language, as well as special behaviour (ex. INIT et al) used by other modules. Its flexibility and beauty is at these costs.
Someone implied here that you can't quote the way you like it lol
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-29 20:54
Perl6 is a completely different language than perl5
you cant fix perl5, its a text processing utility that grew into a programming language. Larry Wall threw everything but the kitchen sink into perl5, therefore its not a coherent programming language but rather a hodgepodge of syntax features and utilities that has become the sys-admin tool extrordinaire
>>15
Not really. Perl6 doesn't make a whole pile of sense, but it's still a thing built out of more cars than cdrs. I have seen languages that work the other way so the charm of overstating perl's silliness is lost on me. Sorry.
Y'know, just throwing this out there, but a programming language->train made of cars doesn't make any kind of sense either, since you need both the car and cdr of the cons to make a list.
>>17
Yeah I get that, but the traincars should be, well, traincars and not traincdrs. I mean, imagine a language where your cars arecdrs. It's not Perl.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-31 9:48
>>20
What if your cars are cdrs and vice versa? That's imaginable.