>>3
hurr, real programs should be installed via toggling switches for hours on end.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-27 4:38
Real games require a Nintendo. Everything else is just a cheap imitation.
Just how many of those games use joysticks and a light gun?
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-27 13:29
Are you saying that real games can run on a system without nintendo underneath it, at all ? As in, without GC, without Wii, and without any miyamoto ?
That sounds preposterous to me.
If it were true (and I doubt it), then companies would be selling systems without a nintendo. This clearly is not happening, so there must be some error in your calculations. I hope you realise that nintendo is more than just mario ? Its a whole system that runs the games from start to finish, and that is a very difficult thing to acheive. A lot of people dont realise this.
Nintendo just spent $9 billion and many years to create Wii, so it does not sound reasonable that some new alternative could just snap into existence overnight like that. It would take billions of dollars and a massive effort to achieve. Sega tried, and spent a huge amount of money developing Saturn but could never keep up with Nintendo. Microsoft tried to create their own system for years, but it still has a huge failure rate and loses the company tons of money.
Its just not possible that a system could be extended to the point where it runs the entire game from start to finish, without using some of the more critical parts of nintendo. Not possible.
I think you need to re-examine your assumptions.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-27 13:34
>>7
lol Although Sony raped Nintendo the last 2 generations