Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

You are shit

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:19

You fags are not real programmers. I know how to program in C++, and C++ is a GREAT language. The fact you keep calling it sepples and saying it sucks just proves you are poor programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:21

>>1
Real programmer, knows how to program 1 language that sucks, dose not think it sucks, feels the need to insult real /prog/ grammer's

Retarded troll detected

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:21

0/10

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:25

Sepples [...] sucks
That sounds suspiciously like C++0x.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:29

>>1
fags [...] programmers [...] know how to program in C++ [...] . GREAT [...] fact [...] sepples [...] sucks.

I agree with your post OP.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:29

>>1
I've been in the CS industry for decades now with a significant portion of that developing software using the C++ language. I can tell you that while it is powerful and capable, it is very large and unwieldy when you want to use the more powerful features of the language. I can't tell you how many time I have been subject to so many subtle gotchas in C++ that occurred as a result of faulty compiler implementations, insane requirements in the standard, or a natural consequence of the complex nature of this standard. If you want powerful features in a language, there are newer ones that'll handle these features more elegantly.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 18:45

>>2
grammer's
lololololol

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 19:17

You fags are not real programmers. I know how to program in Lisp, and Lisp is a GREAT language. The fact you keep calling it Lisp and saying it sucks just proves you are poor programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-13 21:44

>>7
You must be confused

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-14 4:59

>>6
Hello,Bjarne

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-14 17:46

What about OCaML?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-14 19:30

You fags are not real programmers. I know how to program in HASKAL, and HASKAL is a GREAT language. The fact you keep calling it Haskell and saying it sucks just proves you are poor programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-14 20:00

>>1
OCaml is Standard ML for dummies, i.e not so bad.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 0:37

ou fags are not real programmers. I know how to program in Visual Basic, and Visual Basic is a GREAT language. The fact you keep calling it GAY and saying it sucks just proves you are poor programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 0:44

>>14
You are right. I am sorry, I will never insult your superiority again, sir. Please don't beat me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 6:57

'>You fags are not real programmers.
No shit, we never said we were.

'>I know how to program in C++...
Doesn't everyone?

'>C++ is a GREAT language.
You obviously just learned it last week.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 7:51

Just great, green text on prog, posted by a person who admits he's not a programmer. And I thought it couldn't get any worse.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 8:55

You fags are not real programmers. I know how to program in Java, and Java is a GREAT language. The fact you keep calling it ENTERPRISE PROGRAMMING and saying it sucks just proves you are poor programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 8:56

>>1
Quick - explain what the export keyword does.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 8:59

>>19

It's outdated and not even supported in some compilers, so who cares?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 9:08

>>20
It's actually so cutting edge new that some compilers yet don't have support for it. It exists to make code with C++ templates take a little but not quite less than eternity to compile.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 9:15

>>21

"a little but not quite less than eternity to compile."

A little eternity? Or a little less than eternity, which you've contradicted in the rest of the sentence?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 17:08

>>22
Surely you can forgive the use of undecidable grammar when describing a C++ feature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 21:06

>>17
You haven't been here long... Go back to /v/, this board is about prog rock..

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 21:47

>>24
* Black Metal

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-15 22:57

>>25
[Correction: chiptunes. —Ed.]

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 0:20

>>26
I am an electronic music producer and I just might decide to produce black metal chiptunes. You have been warned.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 5:34

>>27
Don't come running to us when you find you don't have enough noise oscillators.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 8:37

>>28
You have no idea. In 1998ish I wrote the noisiest 'oscillator' in existence. Being a /prog/lodyte has its advantages.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 15:34

>>29
Oh, sorry, I thought chiptunes as in tunes made on actual chips, like the ones found on old game systems. Not (for example) chiptunes as in [sup]\[/sup]tunes// made in Reason with as many Subtractor instances as necessary.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 15:40

>>30
Well you could have it that way, but I wouldn't subscribe to a definition that excluded the wonderful works of The Future Crew.

Regardless, a SID for example would be up to the task, so it's not like "pure" chiptunes are out of the question.

Also, what's Reason?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-16 19:03

>>30
My latest composition, ``Bloody saw-toothed dirge of Odin'', features the sound of 20 SID chips being hammered to pieces with a Gameboy.

I expect that it will take people some time to appreciate the true beauty of this, but I'm sure they'll listen to Reason.

Name: >>31 2010-03-16 20:37

I forgot to mention that my noise gen is a grain effect, not a subsynth (I'm assuming that's what 'Subtractor' does.)

Needless to say, >>32 is an impostor.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:41

Erika once told me that Xarn is a bad boyfriend
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -