Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Linux Users

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 5:39

Linux users (aka children), how's it feel to know there's an entire group of individuals who are better at computers than you are? Meet Windows users. They are better than you.

They understand the hardware better, they understand the basic principles of computer science better, they know how networks work better than you. They understand the pros and cons of filesystems (including ntfs) because on Windows, you get to choose FS's; they understand the principles behind operating system design because they run into phrases like "Active Directory" and "User Account Control"; they can probably program, too, since learning a scripting language(e.g. Jscript and Powershell) vastly improves productivity on Windows (and this really pisses you off, since programming was one thing you always failed at on Linux.) Oh, and they probably know Linux better than you, since most advanced Windows
users these days are ex-Linux users who managed to learn Windows years ago, when it was much less user friendly(DOS).

At this point, a confident individual would admit to himself he has a lot to learn about Windows and computers in general. But since you lack the self esteem to do that, you run back to Linux, install Tux Racer (or whatever) and keep repeating to yourself "at least I can run games. at least I can run games."

If you're looking for a job, all this hits you even harder, because you realize a lot of the jobs require Windows in one way or another. Even many of the Linux related jobs recommend Windows! At this point, you rationalize "well the only thing I know is Linux, so I must be a Linux expert!" as if knowing only one thing makes you an automatic expert, or that learning Windows forces you to forget Linux entirely.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/compare/default.mspx
http://www.neowin.net/
http://www.xbox.com/
http://www.bing.com/
http://www.windowsmarketplace.com/
http://www.msn.com/

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 7:15

Are you fucking kidding me??????????????????

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 7:38

NO EXCEPTIONS

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 7:44

>>2
Yes, actually.

Name: sage 2010-03-07 9:32

0/10 for content.
SAGE

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 9:37

>>5
troll rating scale
imageboard-esque use of the sage function

Back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 10:47

I'd like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 11:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 13:02

We are all gonna be replaced by artists

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 13:15

We are all gonna be replaced by artists
did you mean, http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet.html?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 13:30

>>10
Jesus Christ, no.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 13:46

>>10
Now I know what my next LISP interpreter will be written in.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 13:59

>>12
In LISP of course.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 18:25

>>13
“To iterate is human, to recurse divine.”
(L. Peter Deutsch)

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 18:54

/g/ QUALITY TROLL THREAD

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 20:05

I have sex with my linux everyday

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 20:26

>>16
MY BOYFRIEND WILL HAX YOUR ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-07 23:00

>>1
Windows users (...) understand hardware better
Stopped reading right there.

OK not really; I did notice the spoof of http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1231020968/47

But lemme tell you, Linux is hardly the most n00b-friendly OS out there. (guess which one is?) This tends to force Linux users to learn about some stuff, cos, realistically, how far do you get with something like Linux when you don't know shit?
(OK, lemme answer that: Boot from a live-CD, start the first browser it offers, and troll some chan, that's how far.)

Linux has a steeper learning curve at first. This scares n00bz back to the familiar, Redmondian fuzziness offered by the people that gave you Edlin, while us others would rather find out what to read up on, so we can move on and leave you n00bz to your trolling. At least the Linux camp has more rabid fanboiz than you, so as to keep you Lose-7 session from becoming too boring...

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-08 3:27

>>18
I hate to disappoint you, but YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-08 16:58

>>19
Did you count the times my post used the word "troll"? Or the sage? Or the link? ;-)

The main lecture was for late-comers: Windoze is for n00bz & trolls.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 3:21

>>20

TROLL MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 9:04

butthurt Micro$oft faggot

( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 11:17

>>18
n00bz

hello search for fairX the haxxor join his community of hackers if you payhim enough he will give you access to a private area of haxx ;)

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 12:13

>>22
butthurt
Back to /b/, please just for using that term.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:12

>>24
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:27

>>25
U MAD?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:28

>>26
BACK TO THE IMAGEBOARDS!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:28

>>27
oops forgot mah sage

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:31

>>28
You also forgot the [i] and [o] tags.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 17:32

>>29
im too poor for these

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 19:22

As a *nix end user; I assure you that you are beyond any doubt right. However great Linux can be Windows will always be superior.
Windows was a success. Linux was too.

The objective behind Windows was to profit and it was perhaps the most successful business ever undertook.

The reason Linux was crea...............

Well that's for you to find out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 19:23

>>31
Because someone wanted their own personal UNIX?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 19:26

>>32

I don't know. Perhaps that was the motivation behind it of perhaps someone didn't know what to get a Ph.D in.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-09 23:04

>>29,30
It's ok; he gets them for free as long as the ENTERPRISE thread comes first!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 3:51

>>31
Free software. Duh.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 11:08

Actually Linux is written in turbo pascal.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 11:13

>>36
The compiler originally compiled Pastel, an extended, nonportable dialect of Pascal, and was written in Pastel. It was rewritten in C by Len Tower and Stallman,[8]  and released in 1987[9]  as the compiler for the GNU Project, in order to have a compiler available that was free software. Its development was supervised by the Free Software Foundation (FSF).[10]
RMS Saves the day.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 12:07

>>37
I'll never understand why Stallman, such a Lisp-fanatic that he is, didn't just make a Lisp compiler, and then have GCC compile C to Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 12:36

>>38
Is he really that much of a ``Lisp-fanatic''?
He mostly likes Emacs Lisp which is a fairly limited and antiquated(dynamicly scoped by default(lack of lexical scope), which is regarded as a bad trait by both the Common Lisp and Scheme community) Lisp dialect. He won't switch to better dialects for appears to me political reasons and not technical ones. (As a sidenote, most of the CL community's large code base is non-GPL licensed, but usually BSD, MIT, public domain or LLGPL(a more lax LGPL which allows static linking) licensed).

He's also the reason behind the MIT AI lab hacker community schism and all that Symbolics drama. Now those Lisp machines were true built from the ground up from Lisp (from CPU microcode to high-level applications). Their Zmacs and GUI environment were rather innovative (real presentations anyone? not the limited kind we get in Emacs+SLIME), oh and they had a C to Lisp compiler of course, since Lisp was the base language of the OS. Actually making a C to Lisp compiler probably wouldn't be terribly hard, but you will need some non-standard functionality(which is nonetheless present in a fairly efficient form in mainstream CL compilers) for operating with pointers directly. I'm not sure there's much to gain from translating C to Lisp, as Lisp's data is usually tagged which caries benefits and disadvantages, but when applied to C, I'd say it'd be more of a disadvantage. There are however quite a few Lisps which translate to C and integrate with it seamlessly.

So in closing, Stallman may like Lisp, but he will only use what he is comfortable with using politically. We're all grateful for Emacs as we use it a lot, but one should look at what possibilities existed many years ago and see how some were still superior to what Emacs is now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 13:02

>>39
Actually Stallman knows how the real world works.

He doesn't like it, so he has decided to try and change it.

So far, his quest has given us GNU, Linux, Apache, Perl, Gnome, KDE, QT, vim, Firefox, BSD and many more.

To claim that he doesn't have a clue when he started, spearheaded and continues to contribute to a movement that is still growing, and manage to look at the world from a completely different viewpoint and still not die, one can call him anything but an idiot.

He even called Blu-ray, google-books, and e-books before they happened. In 1998 he published a short-story called the right to read. People started to talk about tinfoil hats. The problem is, today, it doesn't even sound that far removed from what we already have.

He also practice what he preaches. He use a chinese netbook, because it is the only offering that gives him the freedom he deserves. Would Obama use a shitty Chinese netbook for the sake of following his convictions? Lolno.

Stallman > Obama.

What about Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or even Steve Ballmer, would they sacrifice anything for their tenets? Do they do anything for us because it's the right thing to do, or just because it's the highest money/work ratio?

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 13:02

... Emacs Lisp ...(dynamicly scoped by default(lack of lexical scope), which is regarded as a bad trait by both the Common Lisp...
Yeah, now. It was considered controversial when CL was being standardised.
He won't switch to better dialects for appears to me political reasons and not technical ones.
He'd already written it once is a good reason.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 13:06

So far, his quest has given us ... BSD ...
( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 13:26

>>42
H e convinced Berkley to release it under a free licence you sill troll!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 14:07

He'd already written it once is a good reason.
Out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 14:31

>>44
Fine. Mr Pedant, he had actually written it twice

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 15:41

>>44
I was taking exception to 'is a good reason' not 'once'.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 16:51

>>46
Exactly, in fact I just invented Wheel 2.1! It is 20% more circular than previous versions!

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-10 17:43

>>47
If you keep that up you might just get one that spins!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List