Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

./configure - useless?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:10

[code]
$ ./configure

   _____  ____  _   _ ______ _____  _____ _    _ _____  ______
  / ____|/ __ \| \ | |  ____|_   _|/ ____| |  | |  __ \|  ____|
 | |    | |  | |  \| | |__    | | | |  __| |  | | |__) | |__  
 | |    | |  | | . ` |  __|   | | | | |_ | |  | |  _  /|  __| 
 | |____| |__| | |\  | |     _| |_| |__| | |__| | | \ \| |____
  \_____|\____/|_| \_|_|    |_____|\_____|\____/|_|  \_\______|
                                                              
          __  ____     __           _   _ _    _  _____
         |  \/  \ \   / /     /\   | \ | | |  | |/ ____|
         | \  / |\ \_/ /     /  \  |  \| | |  | | (___ 
         | |\/| | \   /     / /\ \ | . ` | |  | |\___ \
         | |  | |  | |     / ____ \| |\  | |__| |____) |
         |_|  |_|  |_|    /_/    \_\_| \_|\____/|_____/
 
[code]

No need for a configure script in here, but I guess some people got used to it. To commit, or not to commit?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:10

Oh fuck, I fail so hard

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:55

configure is useless for me as I use CMake.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:59

>>2
Yes, yes you do.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 17:04

This thread is now about how much of a horrible mess Autoconf is. I distinctly remember one checking for strcmp. That's right, fucking strcmp. Whoever tries to compile anything on a system lacking that deserves to get errors up his ass, but instead everyone else who has it (and several dozen other standard library functions it checks) has to wait a ton of time. And don't get me started on the idiots including checks for a FORTRAN compiler in a package that is 100% C. Fucking GNUtards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 17:16

>>5
You are saying this simply because you aren't smart enough to use Autotools. Hey, it's ok... there's nothing wrong in being subnormal.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 17:28

It's terribly bloated.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 17:36

>>6
Oh you

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 18:21

./configure --enable-hax --target=anii --verbose

______
If you believe in Anus Haxing and are 100% proud of it put this as your signature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 18:38

>>9
loll!
______
If you believe in Anus Haxing and are 100% proud of it put this as your signature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 20:24

go away

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 20:43

>>5
PROTIP: GNU Autotools was designed in the early 1980's. You couldn't make such assumptions in those times.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 21:07

>>12
I hope you realize how silly your argument sounds. Why the fuck should I care about problems they had 30 years ago when they are nonexistent today?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 21:43

>>12
I guess M4 was really cool back then.

______
If you believe that >>9-10 should be mechanically de-boned and are 100% proud of it put this as your signature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 0:11

>>14
M4 is fine, it's just that Autotools abuses it severely.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 0:20

dot-slash configure my anus and make my anus and (make) install my anus

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 0:32

useless indeed. writing portable code is much easier without it

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 4:29

>>14
is sad because his anus got not haxed!

______
If you believe in Anus Haxing and are 100% proud of it put this as your signature.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 14:34

hand rolled makefiles or cmake depending on my mood

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 14:52

Same. Autotools are a pain.

______
If you believe that >>9-10,18 should be mechanically de-boned and are 100% proud of it put this as your signature.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 1:25


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List