/prog/ - functional programming

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:26

To be honest, /prog/, don't worry about functional programming and SICP and etc. I'm part of a very small team working on a way to automatically generate optimized code (in ANY language, for any language). We use a functional language to do it, also.

tl;dr i'm the only one worthy of SATORI. Everyone else should stick with their ENTERPRISE BULLSHIT, since i will be your god one day, and everything you write will be optimized, using something I helped develop.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

That's very funny [cool bb code] [/]

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

凄い物語兄貴！

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:56

Are you an queer!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:57

>>2
Oh no I didn't put prog in spoilers! GTFO faggot

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:02

>>5
If you can't optimize your own BBCode you can't optimize shit, you fucking asshole. Get your fucking coat and go back to whatever shithole you came from. You don't fuck with our BBCode customs. Fuck, I think you might have actually angered me, you fucking faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:15

>>6
u mad?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:20

>>6
YOU JUST FUQING ANGERD AN EXPERT PROGRAMER

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:42

>>1
u ar an fag

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:15

Being serious which is the best functional programming language, in real life?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:31

>>10
Assembly.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:38

You can't stop any of us which are already coding in powerful languages. IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:55

>>12
I'm trying to give you a head start.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:58

>>13
I'm trying to give you a head
Are you an queer anon!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 4:45

>>14
No but you certainly are, fag.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 7:45

>>15
When did /prog/ become /b/?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:12

>>16
World4ch seems to be infected with this nonsense. It may have something to do with the new addition of imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:31

>>17
This newfangled "interweb" could be confusing for oldtimers, all those pictures and links could be distracting.
Fortunately, Usenet is still available for your convenience.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:41

>>18
And yet, text only things are apparently better than this ``newfangled interweb'' as you so lovingly call it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:02

>>19
You can use Lynx still.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:09

>>20
Yes. And in some cases, I still do.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 10:32

>>21
I prefer w3m for its vim-like keybindings. Except I actually wish it worked more like less.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:16

>>22
less is more

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:23

>>22,23
Shit. You wankers made me realize that those tools at LULZNIX/anonux are probably writing a moar.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:35

What is the point when clisp is available on every OS and equivalent to asm in performance?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:41

>>25
Thats still slower then optimized JavaScript

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:20

>>24
You're welcome, but clearly most is far superior to any paging tool mortal man could create.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:22

>>27
What about mostest?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:23

>>28
Even molest is better than that

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:38

>>27
Nice pun, asshole!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:46

>>30
http://www.jedsoft.org/most/
Why settle for less?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:23

Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:03

<-- check em dubz

functional programming

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:26

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:56

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:57

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:02

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:15

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:20

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:42

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:15

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:31

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:38

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:55

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:58

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 4:45

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 7:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:12

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:31

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:41

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:02

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:09

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 10:32

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:16

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:23

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:35

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:41

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:20

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:22

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:23

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:38

31 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:46

32 Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:23

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:03

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:26

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:56

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 9:57

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 10:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 12:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 16:58

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 4:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 7:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 8:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 9:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 10:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:16

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:35

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 11:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 12:46

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:03