/prog/ - degenerate

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 23:44

NEWFLASH: function composition is a degenerate case of the Decorator pattern.
http://magicscalingsprinkles.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/why-i-love-everything-you-hate-about-java/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 23:59

I hate Java and its proponents so god damn much. In OP's link the guy creates a PerQueryTimingOutQueryFactory for crying out loud.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 1:48

I really enjoyed that article.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:19

Wait, so he's defending Java against people who claim it's too complicated?

Nice one. Haven't had a laugh this good in a while.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:41

>>4
I fucking hate when people say, "Haven't had" so kindly shut up.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:42

>>5
I fucking hate when people omit the word "it", so kindly shut up;
I also fucking hate it when people say "shut up", so you're a poo brain wee bum head.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:01

>>5-6
Go to hell.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:03

I fucking hate when people say "Go to hell" so kindly shut up

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:09

>>8
Your level of retardation is currently at an all-time constant.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:41

>>9
I see what you did there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 6:02

design pattern
stopped reading there

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:11

All that boilerplate is really important when you work at massive scale and where efficiency really matters.

(　≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:17

>>4
That's exactly it. All the complication in Java is self-inflicted, like the genius in the article.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:28

it's a clear case of stockholm syndrome

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:51

NEWFLASH: LISP is a degenerate case of Q-Basic FUNCTION keyword.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:58

>>15
It's true, some guy on runescape told me so

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-12 16:19

Blogger doesn't even have the balls to approve my comment. Fag deleted it.

just because software doesn’t need to scale doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be written to scale. good design is good design no matter how many users you have.
>
What about trying to write software as simple as possible, but no simpler?

degenerate

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 23:44

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-08 23:59

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 1:48

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:19

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:41

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 2:42

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:01

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:03

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:09

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 3:41

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 6:02

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:11

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:17

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:28

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:51

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 9:58

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-12 16:19

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:51