Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Pascal

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:13

What was the point of this language?  I mean in the early 1990s.  C existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:15

LISP

What was the point of this language?  I mean in the early 2000s.  Haskell existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:15

Why do you exist?  Other people existed, so why you as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:24

[b]C[/c]
What was the point of this language?  I mean in the early 1980's.  ASM existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:28

English

What was the point of this language?  I mean in the early 1800's.  Latin existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 20:31

Holy fucking shit.

Name: sage 2010-01-07 20:53

I thought school was back in

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 21:00

C
What was the point of this language?  I mean in the late 1970s.  Scheme existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 21:01

New languages are created because of hard-defined limitations of older languages versus user requirements and preferences.  That is the theory, anyway.  One leading example, though I would call it more of a scripting language - would be HTML which severely needs a fundamental reconstitution that even CSS do not bring.  More close to reality, though, is that aside from procedural changes that were required for object oriented affinity and perhaps some hassle-free GUI approachability, the only reason most new languages appear these days is because people believe in arrogance that they can build a better mousetrap that the public will buy.  A less cynical, and probably an even closer, examination would probably determine that not all languages are created equal and the weakness of a language to the established mode of thinking can be its strength.  This last point, I believe, is probably most accurate.

Back to cynicism: if Apple created iCode, some people would jump on it just because it is Apple even if it brought little to no enhancements to the growing queue of languages.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 21:14

U MENA XCODE

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-07 22:42

This thread
What was the point of this thread? I mean in early 2010. Other threads existed, so why this as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 0:45

>>1
1990s
( °‿‿°

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 1:03

I'm pretty sure pascal was made before C. Also, Pascal's compilation technique made it extremely easy to port to other systems.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 1:48

>>10
That's an IDE

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 3:06

>>14
Your post suggest that porting C wasn't easy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 4:19

>>16
What about his post suggest that porting C wasn't easy?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 6:53

>>16
No, porting Pascal was shit-easier - half of the compilers were single-pass, for example.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-08 16:37

>>18
My C compiler doesn't need any passes, ergo your wrong bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-09 1:21

>>1
640k should be enough for everyone
Sound familiar?
There are PCs all over the place, so why Macs? Why retrogaming? Amigas? Chiptunes? There is rap music, so why bother with rock? Pop? Jazz? Folk?

But no. There is one, so let's kill all the others. Let's not have diversity. Not even directional chaos; that might even bring us someplace worthwhile. Can't have that.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-09 13:44

Jews
What was the point of those people?  I mean in the early 1940's.  Nazis existed, so why those as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-09 15:04

Whats the point of our galaxy? I mean in the early times of Milky Way other galaxies existed, so why this one as well?

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-09 17:39

>>2-23
What was the point of these posts?  I mean in the early 2030s.  >>1 existed, so why these as well?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List