Software Licences

Hey guys, sorry if this is a stupid question but I've been searching around for a while to try and find an easy licence that has the following requirements:
-Software can be modified/altered in any way
-Neither the Software, nor derived copies can be distributed for a profit
-All distributed copies must retain the same copyright licence

I've been searching around for a few hours, and found a few that look like they would fit these, but all I've seen exclude something, or include a heap of other restrictions. Eventually I gave up and wrote up a little one, I was just wondering whether someone could take a look over it and give any suggestions on improving it; perhaps suggesting a stable licence that follows these requirements?

*******************************************************************
**** TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION *
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person     *
* obtaining a copy of this software or associated documentation,  *
* to deal in the software with the rights to use, copy, modify,   *
* merge, publish and/or distribute copies of the Software, and to *
* permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so,      *
* subect to the following conditions:                             *
*                                                                 *
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be  *
* included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. *
* Neither this Software, nor modified/derived copies shall be     *
* sold for a profit without explicit written permission from the  *
* initial creator of the Software.                                *
*                                                                 *
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, *
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. In no event shall *
* the authors or copyright holders be liable for any claim,       *
* damages, or other liability, whether in an action of contract,  *
* tort or otherwise, arising from, out of, or in connection with  *
* the software or the use or other dealings in the software.      *
*******************************************************************

Anyways hope this is the right section for this, if it's not just let me know which I should post this in.

use the freebsd license, faggot.

>>-Neither the Software, nor derived copies can be distributed for a profit

>>1
PROTIP: nobody wants to use your shitty amateur code.
Use a free as in free license, not shitty restrictive viral crap like the GPL.

>>4
But I like shitty amateur code and viruses! What now?

>>5
support the GNU.
their sole purpose is to fill the world with crappy amateur code and viral bullshit.

I've been searching around for a few hours
Would you believe some people make a profession over copyright law? Hahaha, it's true! I'm with you, though, if I can't find it in an hour and a half, might as well post to a random message board.

The MIT and BSD licenses > *

>>1
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1874956/searching-for-non-commercial-license-for-source-code

>>9
That link's very helpful; I like the Mame license, it's pretty awesome

Anyways thanks everyone for helping. Now my shitty amateur code is safe!

Use the APL.

Wanting to protect your code from others is a sign of your own insecurity. When your code is alive with the Tao it flows like water, merging and branching unhindered in a beautiful dance. Truly, for a programmer loving your code means letting it free.

The Master
codes without doing anything
and teaches without saying anything.
Things arise and he lets them come;
things disappear and he lets them go.
He has but doesn't possess,
acts but doesn't expect.
When his work is done, he forgets it.
That is why it lasts forever.

>>6
its still better than that microsoft crap.

>>12
I loved you 5 times!

I chose sex 5 times

All I can say to this is lol. This is basically the exact experience that I have had with the post-secondary institutions within the United States. I can honestly say that for the majority that professors and the institution wish to stifle creativity and independent thought. The narrow minded answers they want completely disregard the plethora of other choices that would reveal the correct answer. Whether or not the story is true, this is the attitude of the American educational institute, for those that think outside the box continue to. Revolutionist, non-conventionalist, and the blatant disregard for normalcy are the fundamentals to continuing our species in the area of science.

[b]test[/b]