Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Fuck WIKIPEIDA

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:13

holy fuck I hate [[wikipedia]], how fucking [[patronizing]] is it that [[bloggers]] and news reports and shit link every 3rd fucking word to wiki. and IRC is turning into a gateway to wiki, people used to have interesting discussions now they just fuck off after someone links them to wiki.

fuck this shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:16

“I couldn't ignore that banner at the top of the site anymore... I use Wikipedia far too often to ignore the need!”

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:17

“I'll be proud to tell my kids I chipped in, however little.”

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:17

“Creating a belief in the goodness of humanity - one article at a time.”

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:18

Wikipedia is there when you need it — now it needs you.
$2.7M of $7.5M USD copied...

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:18

“Knowledge is dangerous! Pass it on!”

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:20

“My amount is little, but my support is sincere.”

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:23

Please stop insulting legitimate websites by calling wikipedia ``wiki''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:23

>>1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:24

>>9
fuck me, where's the wikipedia entry on proper 4chan bbcode?

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:32

Actually it's a good thing auto-linking excludes closing parenthesis, but a good implementation should keep track of whether there were open ones.

In any case, Wikipedia is lenient enough that the link works just fine, so you actually have zero problems.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-10 18:38

>>11
Actually it's a good thing auto-linking excludes closing parenthesis, but a good implementation should keep track of whether there were open ones.
So much agreement it might even be gay.

so you actually have zero problems.
And Zhaozhou was enlightened.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 10:19

A good implementation should not auto-link. It makes people lazy and their posts non-portable.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 11:18

>>13
Autolinking is fine, if it is in the code that generates the display, rather than the code that stores posts.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 15:31

Any modern browser allows you to select an unlinked URL and open it directly without the need of any extensions. And by modern I mean Firefox trunk or Chrome trunk.
BTW doesn't shiitchan do code highlighting fully client-side? So wasteful on my CPU, better to do it just once on the server.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 15:47

>>15
anonib did all BB^coding on the client side too.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 15:52

>>16
That's just too dangerous, complex BB^code scripts could hang or crash most browsers. You should only attempt execution of such a powerful language under a restricted virtual machine will all possible security measures.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 16:01

>>17
I know, that's the first thing that crossed my mind when I found out. Imagine all the XSS attacks or infinite loops you could achieve with defines!

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-11 21:59

>>17
You jest, but this used to wreak havoc upon my Firefox:

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-12 6:18

>>19
As it just did mine, you bastard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-12 7:42

>>19
>>20
USE OPERA!

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-25 12:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:56