Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

On C and Its Incrementive Form

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 13:16

SEPPLES programmer here. I hate object oriented programming. I never use any of the object features of C++ in my code. Would I be better off switching to C? What else am I missing out on?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 13:17

Yes, switch to C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 13:39

>>2
Misues of sage, reported.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 16:59

>>2

But why?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 17:42

Yes, switch to C.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 20:10

switch (language) { default: return C; }

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 22:02

I'm not >>2, but
C advantages:
- don't have to cast void *
- no name mangling by default (in C++ you might have to wrap some headers with extern "C")
- simper to learn whole language
C++ without objects advantages:
- some libraries like STL? (these might count as objects though...)

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-27 23:26

C++ has templates. They are really useful.

Unfortunately, there seems to be no C-like (systems) language that has templates but not OOP. In this regard, even Go is worse than Sepples.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 0:05

You should be using objects in sepples and you should be using objects in C. C++ is terrible, but OO is not, even if you're using C++. Changing languages won't do anything for you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 0:16

Objects are nice, learn some Smalltalk, where EVERYTHING is an object.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 2:42

>>7
- don't have to cast void *
but you still should. -Wc++-compat

- no name mangling by default (in C++ you might have to wrap some headers with extern "C")
big deal, just write without extern "C", let the sepples developers send you a patch

possible to learn whole language
fixed

some libraries like STL? (these might count as objects though...)
you put this one in the wrong pile, stl is worse than useless

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 7:18


CAST MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 7:50

Anus *anus = (Anus *) GetAnus(">>12");

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 9:50

>>13
/*Warning! Cannot cast VAGINA to ANUS*/

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 15:02

OBJECT ORIENTATE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 15:06

class ANUS{
public:
   str HAX();
};

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 15:35

>>14
Vagina *v = reinterpret_cast<Vagina>(GetAnus(">>12"));

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-28 15:57

>>14
If your GetAnus is returning a Vagina, then someone is doing something very wrong indeed. You should really implement a GetHaxxable function which returns a Haxxable object.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-24 11:43

>>22
epic win nice doubles bro

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-24 11:46


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List