>>13
I never said I was happy with C++. I was merely rebutting the proposition that Objective C was somehow better. It's not.
Your attitude really underscores one of the main problems I have with Objective C. Its users tend to have had way too much kool-aid to be cognizant of its faults. At least C++ users
tend to realize at the very least that it's a very large language, perhaps overgrown, and that some of it really doesn't make sense.
Personally, I don't use either. Plain old C has been very good to me.