Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

How do I program, /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-06 20:17

I have installed a distribution of GNU/Linux. I'm not sure what to do next...
Can I have some help here /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:24

>>39
troll.
most operating system design book, these so-called "newbie books" are all very well respected and most written 20 or 30+ years ago.
many of these "newbie books" were around when you were in your mother's womb.
these "newbie books" are the same ones the Linus used while writing his kernel.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:26

>>40
He hasn't done it YET because it would display his true motives too obviously.
Now that you faggots are going around calling it GNU/Linux it's only a matter of time until he starts saying it should be called RMS/GNU/Linux.
And you fanboy retards will actually do it for him.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:27

>>5
Just grab it from CVS, then extract it into some directory site site-emacs, and then add it to your .emacs file. There's even a "screencast" about it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:32

ITT: /g/tards who think that applications are part of the operating system.
lol

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:36

>>44
IABT

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 8:59

>>45
I 'AVE BEEN TROLLED

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:00

>>34
A complete OS is one that is defined by POSIX.
By your definition, there are no complete OSs

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:01

>>46
I AIN'T BEEN TROLLED

Name: !Ep8pui8Vw2 2009-11-07 9:10

I really don't know how to articulate this any more without identifying myself. I was not an OS pioneer, but I was in the scene when IBM began selling their hardware to businesses. I was an OS programmer in that era studying, and improving the OS that was delivered. The OS was the fundamental layer of software that exist to support to application software. Stuff like text editors and compilers were part of this OS. Without this OS software, the rest of the system could not be controlled. The kernel was always one part of this system, the very core of the OS.

Name: Expert Librarian 2009-11-07 9:11

>>34,39
In addition, we have no universally accepted definition of what is part of the oerating system. A simple viewpoint is that it includes everything a vendor ships when you order "the operating system."....A more common definition is that the operating system is the one program running at all times on the computer (usually called the kernel), with all else being application programs. This last definition is the one that we generally follow.

Operating System Concepts, 6th Edition  Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne Section 1.1.2 p6

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:28

>>49
You won't fool me, Moot can't program

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:29

>>49
i'm intrigued.
or HIBT?

regardless, can you really consider the ancient computers of times past to have an OS in the modern sense?
i mean, computers, software, and operating systems have changed an incredible amount since then.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:34

>>52
In the modern sense, perhaps not, but they did have a program that was resident in memory to transfer control between jobs at least.

Name: A Different Expert Librarian 2009-11-07 9:35

Computer software can be divided roughly into two kinds: system programs, which manage the operation of the computer itself, and application programs, which perform the actual work the user wants. The most fundamental system program is the operating system, whose job is to control all the computer's resources and provide a base upon which the application programs can be written
Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 3rd Edition, Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Chapter 1, Page 1.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:41

>>49
Bill Gates? IN MY /prog/?
It's more likely than you think.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:44

>>55
sed "s/Moot/Bill Gates/" < >>51
same shit, different anus

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:47

>>56
moot hasn't used that tripcode for years.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:49

>>57
lies

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:51

>>57
As long as he doesn't pull the plug on world4ch, I don't give a shit what that /b/tard does or doesn't go by

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 9:57

>>59
i asked moot 3 times whether he visits us here on world4ch (two in threads, and once as an ancillary to an email), he ignored me every time :(

Name: !Ep8pui8Vw2 2009-11-07 10:58

>>52,54
To me, an OS will always be an OS - the fundamental software layer between the hardware the higher level software that depend on the OS. Andy Tanenbaum terms my "OS" as "system software". While I don't think he's incorrect, I'm not going to change my terminology on his account.

>>60
Moot doesn't care about w4ch. I am not Moot, I just like this tripcode.

Name: !Ep8pui8Vw2 2009-11-07 12:47

DISREGARD THAT I SUCK MOOTS COCK

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-07 17:44

>>61
Your OS?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-05 8:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-26 12:21

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 7:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 1:27


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List