Special case of remove_if (C++)

Sup /prog/, I'm asking for a bit of help.

So I got a std::vector<std::pair<typeA , typeA>>, and I want to remove all pairs containing some typeA value 'x'.

(How) can I do this in a easy, elegant way?

I've thought about using the STL algorithm remove_if, but looking at this reference:

http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/remove_if/

template < class ForwardIterator, class Predicate >

ForwardIterator remove_if ( ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator last, Predicate pred )

pred
    Unary predicate taking an element in the range as argument, and returning a value indicating the falsehood (with false, or a zero value) or truth (true, or non-zero) of some condition applied to it. This can either be a pointer to a function or an object whose class overloads operator().

Seems like remove_if can't do the trick then, eh? It has to have the pair object and the reference value 'x'.

This is a c++ problem, if I didn't make it clear enough before.

This is a c++ problem
Actually, C++ IS the problem.

>>1
I guess you could say you dream of cocks drifting across the blue sky.

can I do this in a easy, elegant way?
Sepples
（　≖‿≖）

(remove x sequence)

template <class typeA> struct containsValue {
    typeA value;
    containsValue(typeA val) : value(val) {}
    bool operator()(pair<typeA, typeA> subj)
    {
        return subj.first == value || subj.second == value;
    }
};
...
    v.erase(remove_if(v.begin(), v.end(), containsValue<int>(5)), v.end());

>>6
Thank you, much appreciated.

>>5
Is that the haskell I keep hearing of?

Some people, when faced with a problem, will say: ``I know, I'll use the STL!''. Now they have three problems. (The third being Sepples).

>>1:3: error: `>>' should be `> >' within a nested template argument list

>>1
I don't see why you'd use vector when you seem to want key/value functionality. map and unordered_map are designed specifically for key/value.

I'd understand if they were just a pair with no special relationship and you want duplicates, but that STILL doesn't make sense.

Is there something I'm missing or do you just suck dick at picking the right tool for the job?

>>11
do you just suck dick at picking the right tool for the job?
OP is using C++

>>8
Common Lisp.

>>13
R6RS.

>>14
ROSSICKSRIS

>>14
Hmm, forgot they added that function to R6RS too. There are some differences between it and the CL version, such as lack of the large variety of keyword arguments.

^{Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''}

<-- check em dubz

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:29

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:30

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List

All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -