/prog/ - HOT NAKED STRIPPING COEDS

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-27 22:32

With every vendor claiming 185% performance improvements every year, how comes javascript is still SLOW AS FUCK?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-27 22:44

>>1
I imagine it's the same reason that desktop software doesn't get any faster - feature bloat and lazy programmers

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:20

OH LOOK THAR MODARN COMPUTERS HAEV AT LEAST 4GB OF RAM AND 2GHZ OF SPEEDZ SO THIS O(n^4) FUNCTION I CALL EVERY OTHER TIEM SHOULDN'T MATTR ALL THAT MUCH RIGHT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:24

Because jQuery

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:26

>>3
This is what far too many reddit reading pseudo-hipsters actually believe

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:48

>>5
they do not - that would imply they know what O(n^4) means.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 4:57

dom manipulation

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 5:25

>>6
Any fool can learn it in ten minutes, it takes a master to learn it is pointless knowledge.

Name: Namae 2009-10-28 6:39

Because... ENTERPRISE _QUALITY.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 13:08

>>8
i wanted to post something but then i realized that YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 19:33

I think you'll find it does pretty well if you implement something from scratch and follow and take advantage of standards. PHP/Java-using retards that use Prototype for checking a couple of form fields can drag it down to what is basically interpreter-in-an-interpreter performance, but I haven't had any problems iterating over and running regular expressions against a megabyte of data in tens of milliseconds, which is good enough for UI stuff.

I'm sure there's still room for improvement, but the best implementations are pretty decent for a securely sandboxed language of that dynamicity. See for instance http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=v8&lang2=java , where though none of the ECMAScript engines are really geared towards number crunching, results are mostly within order-of-magnitude.

Name: 2010-10-26 14:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 5:04

Name: 2013-01-25 18:15

顇ᔩ预䤐円坹㤢䌳瑣甦硤㍲䐁ԣ隄ԇ匶⍦ʖ䀧聠膖眡暓琥㎃

Name: 2013-01-25 18:16

祠⑙鉶䦗>㕑⒙ㄈीͦ鈧傄㤃⡉褄Ⅲ艇晤卲啄よⅇ䁱╇Ņ⊀ょᥴ螑䡴薉㔸ᘄ鉧构ґ☤΀⑵ቦ攓ࡂᠰ琁က瀀與畓镦頔灡ᡓ䌁␇砗፨ᙣ⥥礲Ű⁴喅猣㜶酖ŵᜇ票㐥畤Т偨✥椆摷悀倐䜇琕充閗቉搁灃䊂脳敓碖㖐晄࢑萤月蝉熈蠦門䔔䖅ᕹဤ䌨敖悀抁ᖅ΀ᡠ䉅瑃砒院ऑ妙⑐अ無䥈ͦ敇陥䢙畣脂艰栲甦垘፧饅蘴玃䢃䄴℆颖钄圶ᐤ膄偑暈ᤸٶ镦㡹ࡦ塱舃蕉ₑ✥捸⑖㘳ጉ奉ᐘ䠉茈࢐楱耖䠒㤄㖑ᕦ銀恴蝠掅ͤ℈薑删鉲䚃▁⡹桇枘䀉癲㦈瘒吡嚗㕦璈嘣儰ঀ̧別瘁奣ᥩ煴祣順領草桖䁗锦㐇匡ᘶ朐䀡ٹ楢⢁㝉限䅇唸枉ㅉ艙 ŧ堤इ襩隀ऴ兵熈剔⅔吖蝨ܡ⌐楇⡂呄祙呖䤃灳椁熇⥣慓噅႙ᅲ睙ᚕ夹ऒ奅冕玕㥡衙葀儙腣蜰䁣ᡅ堲銕ࡠ炂牰墇䞆錣㙨砓▙這ፘ样ᦄܗ霠奢❆ᝦࡂ┦螘楐刂砗怗襓腕ȇ父ង蕦瑀朇偖逑唑術獩杩ȔС㔦⑷螆祴碔具ش㠧割ᝅࡁ㦙腅䡤锷㕃ゖㅦ䉆Ѱ⡅猀㖓ऴ䌁扆㡗酴䢐ᔐ䔄ࠖ灢坕餡Ԩ癄㕢夹㕉霩塲茩衤䑐朣腤掑Ѡ鍷癥᠘焁霒蠱ᙱ傓╉⑙核瑂䝢衖㐅灑靂癉⠨霡茴蔠ㅅ區ᙂ㡸⠙⥲㔹隃䂒厓ذ鉈頵ሓ؆楃癇♔蕖閙腣硅呅ᙹᙩॴ馒却ᑵ戴c玈焳摰₂噔艣戔䂆鎘ƃ董甥蒗䑨1礁䥂鑒ѣ用奶蕰刡授⦖䢔ࠁᡷ㜈㉖榐䈲䠩ᅷ畃腵Զᜳቧ奀╤坨݄餥鐘险荸奓㈤霵蔴څ攐㉥饢舐☧᠖ၢ剠蝥葈㥖褂獀ኂㆆሓ圶䝸偱虢瑨ᤈ蘲䐹傗䉡ᥢ蜤捇㠓ጷ䥑⁹㥲䘄暇⥶䈃

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-26 10:43

>>11
Interesting. v8 is usually several times slower than Java, but with less memory usage and less code. Sounds like a good tradeoff for not having to write Java.

HOT NAKED STRIPPING COEDS

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-27 22:32

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-27 22:44

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:20

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:24

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:26

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 2:48

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 4:57

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 5:25

9 Name: Namae 2009-10-28 6:39

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 13:08

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-28 19:33

12 Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-26 14:03

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 5:04

15 Name: 2013-01-25 18:15

16 Name: 2013-01-25 18:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-26 10:43