Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Let's be friendly to GIRLS

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-20 9:22

• Have a zero tolerance policy concerning online harrassment and enforce it.
• Don't allow sexist jokes. It's impossible for a woman to tell if you "really" mean it, and even if you don't it will be tedious and insulting for her to spend her time ignoring or humouring sexist jokes.
• Write all of your introductory material in such a way that a woman will recognise herself in it just as much as a man will. Use "she" to describe readers in various places, and use female names for some of your hypothetical examples when you have them.
• Unless your group has an explicitly sexual purpose, minimise the discussion of the sexual desires of participants. Many women (entirely justifiably) fear online harrassment in sexual contexts.
• Involve women in the creation and governance of your forum at every level.
• If there is an anti-feminist incident in your forum, apologise simply. Don't use phrasing that suggests that only women would have found the incident upsetting, or that you would have found the incident unproblematic if there weren't complaints. Don't tell women how they should feel about the incident: listen to them describe how they feel.
• Women are often placed in the role of "nanny" in forums. Don't leave the enforcement of social norms to the women members of the group.

Source: http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Women-friendly_forums

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:26

>>116
The moral of the story: By expanding the definition of citizenship for tax purposes they only hastened the fall, which in AD 212 was well underway.

There are alot of parallels between Late Antiquity and the current state of things in the West these days...

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:26

>>114
Ah, I was suggesting that the term Roman means a Roman citizen, but I see there were several classes of citizenship and you seem to be referring to Cives Romani, so feel free to disregard my remark.
On the other hand, we can both agree that (limited) citizenship was in fact used as a tool of indoctrination into the Roman Empire (and in future empires) and that we can call the Romans a multi-racial society.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:27

>>122
taxes. then as now politics follows the money.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:27

>>121
Perhaps, but it's hardly the only reason for the collapse of Rome and it's certainly not fair to blame it all on that. The Roman Empire was, simply, too big.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:28

Stop acting like bitches. Nobody cares about your Roman shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:30

>>125
shut up, I learnt something today, which hasn't happened on /prog/ in quite a while

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:34

>>124
I'd say not too big, more like failed to adapt, or got lazy.
As do the people that create them, cultures have a life cycle too.
The Romans were supremely gifted at logistics and governance. After a while they just wanted to sit in their villas and enjoy the good life and what was the political correctness of the day.
Instead of working hard, busting ass, and maybe a few heads where required.

Sound familiar? Like the West since the end of WW2, perhaps?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-22 19:58

>>127
Not really, no.

Name: 98 2009-10-22 21:14

I hadn't been so effective in months.
It's depressing, I was so unsubtle and obvious in this one, why must you reward mediocrity?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 0:24

This thread is not about the Roman empire. Please stop talking about the Roman empire unless it is in the context of feminism in programming.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 3:50

>>130
I'm sorry, I didn't quite catch that. Could you say it again, but in Latin? Gratias ago.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 4:21

>>130
Please stop using the word "Feminism". It's sexist.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 4:45

>>107
Spain (Iberians and Moors), Argentina (Spaniards and Indians), the Soviet Union, and the United States of America.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 4:47

>>129
the thing is that people think they're clever and so they respond to bad trolls but not to people who are cleverer than them because it intimidates them
remember you're trolling a board full of cowards and happy travels

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 4:59

>>134
You seem to be forgetting that some people take on the trolls on purpose just to let off some steam

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 5:00

I just had an epiphany; our sexist programming languages have been this way for far too long.

We must create the A++ language, so as to make women feel that smaller breasts are okay too. Instead of the primitive male groupings of namespaces, we must have "socialspheres." We don't build structs and classes, we build "kits" and "rooms," like makeup and decor.

The "main" routine implies dominance of the program, and is thus a corollary to male control. We must subsume this for the "committee" routine. using is not contextually appealing, we prefer "receiving." Alternate syntax is required for aliasing socialspheres.

Datatypes are generally fine as they are. However, most programs run on a single thread. This also represents the one-track male mind. Programs compiled in A++ must run with at least 4 threads. This also ensures that the computer can simply not like you on any given day of the lunar cycle.

The A++ standard library needs beefing up; no female can be caught using the same code as another female, particularly at a LAN party. Consider many pointless additions from the Boost library.

Exceptions are fine as they are, the program is supposed to drop everything and handle their problems. References are heavily enforced due to their importance in female culture, but const correctness is discouraged. Forcing const correctness on one may imply a standard of beauty or properness.

With these simple changes, I'm sure all women would be completely satisfied with the programming world.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 5:02

>>136
I fear that some women will see this and make this a reality, but then I remembered that this is /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 5:13

>>136
IVLIVS CÆSAR would not approve of this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 5:27

>>138
Well, he was a man, duh

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 5:49

>>139
Of course he was, who in their right mind would let a woman rule the Roman empire? No successful nation has ever been ruled by a woman. There may have been some guys in drag, and transvestites, but even that is kind of borderline.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 6:13

>>140
Ptolemy XII ``Auletes''

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 6:42

>>140
Queen Victoria was a trap, *hot*

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 8:47

How about no. Girls can't code. Girls are fucked. Girls deserve to be raped.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 8:57

>>143
The best thing about this opinion is that every programmer in America completely agrees with it. And that's why female programmers stay the hell away.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 9:21

>>144
The best thing about this opinion is that every programmer in America completely agrees with it. And that's why female Indian JAVA EXPERTS are taking all the American jobs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 9:22

>>145
Really? Shit, I knew it. Bitches can't be trusted to do a man's work properly. Should have known all those sluts and whores were the ones programming in Java.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 10:03

There seems to be a lot of Asian female programmers.
Or at least from Korea.
I've personally met two female Korean programmers, and I've never even been to their country.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 10:13

female Korean programmers
not sure if want

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 11:14

>>147
Proof that Asian girls are smarter and superior to our Western scum.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 11:49

>>140
at various points in the history of Great Britain the de facto ruler was the queen

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:33

>>149
Hideous asian girls don't count, dear. Please crawl back into your dungeon.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:44

I am in awe that this "programming" community is still alive.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:46

>>152
ONE WORD THE FORCED OBJECTIFICATION OF WOMEN THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:50

>>152
Constant slut shaming and sexist mentalities are basically endemic to American (and some other western countries) programmers. There is nothing new about this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:51

>>152
back to /code/, please

And for god's sake, no fucking code/coed jokes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:51

>>155
LOLOL U SED COED XD so random

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 12:52

>>154
Yeah, cause eastern cultures aren't sexist at all, amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 13:05

HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED HOT FEMINISTS STAYING CLOTHED

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 13:07

HOT FEMINISTS
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-23 13:07

A majority of women around the world associate gender justice with sharia compliance.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List