/prog/ - Dont look here faggot

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 23:56

Are DHCP requests big endian?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:02

Is the machine big endian?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:48

big endian on the machine or on the wire?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:59

The machine your sending it too.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 1:10

for fucks sake, its not the machines responsibility to ensure the byte order of the packets.

does one need to send the bytes as big endian.

that is the fucking question.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 1:23

>>5
Yeah, figure out what endian the machine is.

Good luck!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 2:50

Network byte order is big endian. Is DHCP a network protocol? You'd think it is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 2:56

MY ANUS IS A NETWORK PROTOCOL

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:07

>>6

Thanks comp sci 101.

>>7

Its not definate, but it does confirm my suspiciouns which is more than you niggers ahve done.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:12

>>9

>>6 is right, you should go find out what endianness the target is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:32

>>1
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:07

>>11

Dynamic Hax Common Perl

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:11

>>10

And you should understand how client/server works.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:49

>>7
not too bad.
6/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 17:50

>>8
IS IT A TOKEN RING!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 18:03

You new to DHCP protocol, >>1? Stop filling our board with these stupid threads. Read the manual: You need to find the endianness of the target machine.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 2:58

dynamiac anus haxing

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-13 22:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:10

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 14:22

Note that 2^|X| is the cardinality of the power set of the set X and Cantor's diagonal argument shows that 2^|X| > |X| for any set X. This proves that no largest cardinal exists (because for any cardinal κ, we can always find a larger cardinal 2[sup]κ[/sup). In fact, the class of cardinals is a proper class. (This proof fails in some set theories, notably New Foundations.)

Dont look here faggot

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-14 23:56

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:02

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:48

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 0:59

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 1:10

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 1:23

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 2:50

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 2:56

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:07

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:12

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 3:32

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:07

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 4:11

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 16:49

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 17:50

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-15 18:03

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-16 2:58

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-13 22:35

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:10

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 14:22