using namespace std;
class illegalmoveexception : public illegal_move_exception
{
public:
illegalmoveexception();
: illegal_move_exception("invalid move")
Yeah, you not being able to do something as fucking simple as this should be a giant sign that you should consider a future working as a dish washer.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-13 10:37
>>10
You can probably go eat a dick, some of us like to do more than read C++ manuals all day, I for one like to talk to other people and go outside. Im a CIS major not a CS major big difference but I still have to program. I need to learn the theories only but I have to still do the work.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-13 10:46
>>11
Then go do the work! I, on the other hand, will continue to eat copious amount of dick.
>>11 I need to learn the theories only
If you can't understand how to fucking use exceptions in their most basic form, I doubt you can cope with any level of CS theory
>>14
SO does that mean quantum mechanics are all liars just because they can't finish the work, or that string theorists are wrong? Does that mean people who believe in religion are wrong, or that atheists are wrong because they have an idea they just can't implement it to come up with a solution. Your logic is flawed sir.
>>22
You are an imbecile, In the first two cases they are working with incomplete theories in a still exploratory area of science, whereas you are dealing with something both simple and well understood. Religious people are wrong, because they choose to believe in fairy stories over providing any level of plausibility or falsifiability. And finally, what idea do atheist have that they can't implement a solution for? It seems to me the only thing that characterises Atheism is a lack of belief in a deity.
>>23
Atheism is the belief in no god(s), which also can't be proven. Agnosticism is understanding that neither side can prove their claim without supernatural forces intervening.
Religion - There is a cat in that box.
Atheism - There is no cat in that box.
Agnosticism - I don't know what's in that box.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 0:31
>>27
I might add to your post the following:
Theism is the belief in a supernatural god(s).
Atheism is the lack of belief.
Gnosticism is the belief that we can determine whether or not supernatural forces exists, we just haven't done it yet.
Agnosticism is the belief that we cannot know - not now or ever - whether or not supernatural forces exist. The very question is outside the realm of quantifiable knowledge.
It is possible to be a Gnostic Atheist and an Agnostic Theist, although these two classes are quite rare.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 0:36
>>27
Quantum mechanics - there is a cat in that box which as a superposition of both existing and non-existing
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 1:15
>>27
Religion — For no reason at all, I believe there is a cat in that box.
Athiesm — Since I have no proof, I do not believe there is a cat in that box.
Agnosticism — Lol u guize. I don't believe there's a cat in that box, but I don't want to say so.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 1:24
>>30
This isn't right at all. See >>28. Gnosticism and theism are not mutually exclusive
>>30 Agnosticism — Lol u guize. I don't believe there's a cat in that box, but I don't want to say so.
Agnosticism - I have no idea if there's a cat, or anything in the box, nor do I give a fuck about it, so I'm not going to make assertions which cannot be proven.
>>36
I'd like to hold this post up as an example of Optimised Quoting, that we can all learn from.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 4:18
>>35
Except gnosticism is not about belief in a supernatural force. It is about verifiability; whether we can or cannot know about the existance of supernatural forces. It is possible to believe in a god but also be Agnostic.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-14 4:24
>>33
actually, it's more like:
I believe that there is some type of cat, however I don't believe in that we'll ever know whether or not there really is a cat, nor will we ever know the type of cat inside.