Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Have You Listened to Your Program Today?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 17:08

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 17:28

Sounds like shit and/or contemporary art.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 17:31

>>2
What's the difference?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 17:32

it's enterprise quality

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 17:36

I can diagnose website performance issues by sound alone.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 18:39

The pleasure of being Windowsed inside

I'm having to write a short notice ISA 2006 http filter for work. I love windows programming so much. Everything is so logical.

LOoL

Every windows code I've ever written always has a significant chunk of code that I've copied from the internet or sample somewhere, and I don't really understand what it does. Just for like initialize some MFC/abstract bullshite. Then there's my functions I don't avoid changing anything outside them.

POSIX is much nicer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 18:47

>>6
Just because you're too stupid to understand an API doesn't mean it's bad.[1]

[1] - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa383749%28VS.85%29.aspx

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 18:54

WinAPI is over-engineered, but I like it since it lets you do just about anything. For common tasks, it's always nice to build a few nice easy to use abstractions over them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 19:08

>>7
too stupid to understand an API
Ask a .NET developer how a binary tree or linked list structure works and they will say something like this: "uhhhhhhhhhh. it works by typing import System.LinkedList".
Silly API babies are completely clueless.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 19:11

>>9
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 19:49

>>9
.NET != WinAPI
There's plenty of APIs which work with more advanced structures or which require linked lists.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 20:26

>>7
Well, considering the average quality of Windows software, I'd think there's something wrong with the API. (By "quality" I don't mean "user-visible" quality, albeit the "please compile and work" hack jobs end up leaking into the end-user experience sooner or later)

I can count with two hands the software makers I'd trust to produce half-decent Windows code. Everything else... well, you're lucky if it even works when Windows isn't installed in C:\WINDOWS.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 20:49

>>12
Well, it's true, there's a lot of crap software out there, but I usually blame that on the general incompetency of the masses. Windows being the most popular desktop OS, you're bound to attract the most stupid developers wanting to make a quick buck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 8:42

>>9
Ask a LISP developer how a binary tree or linked list structure works and they will say something like this: "uhhhhhhhhhh. it works by typing (cons head tail)".
Hot naked coeds are completely clueless.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 10:35

>>14
You're just grouping people in mutually exclussive binary groups. The world doesn't work like that. I'd except most Lispers learned other languages before they came onto Lisp.

I know Lisp, C, x86 asm and some VHDL. I know very well how things work at the lowest levels as well as how one can abstract things at the meta-linguistic level.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 10:37

s/except/expect/g

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 11:51

NO EXPECTIONS

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 16:05

NO EXPECTORATIONS

cough cough

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 19:34

>>12
I can count with two hands the software makers I'd trust to produce half-decent Windows code.
Do you mean 10 or 1024?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-09 20:06

>>12
I just realized that if I wrote some software which was going to access C:\WINDOWS I would probably hard-code the path too and I feel kind of bad about it :(

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-08 19:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 21:06

<-- check em dubz

Name: tray 2012-03-14 16:21

you better be

Name: tray 2012-03-14 16:22

you better be

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List