Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Robotics

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 5:04

Why has Python superseeded Scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 5:08

>>1
because nobody uses functional programming any more

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 5:20

Because people stopped thinking.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 5:21

I'm quoting - Abelson, while he doesn't like the general situations, realizes that most of the work is backed up by frameworks and it's important to stress that for such a course to be practical. Pure SICP courses don't exist in the limelight any more in any case - UC Berkeley's course mashes in Simply Scheme and abstraction via library.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 5:56

>>1
A better question is, ‘Why is his about the twentieth time we've had this thread’?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 6:42

To get to the other side.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 9:11

>>6
Which side is the other side?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 9:15

>>7
The side that it wasn't already on.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 10:30

Because, coincidently, Guido's taste in programming languages is the lowest common denominator. That and the fuckton of libraries. And the sparing users from having to choose from a bunch of varyingly incompatible implementations.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 11:17

And the sparing users from having to choose from a bunch of varyingly incompatible implementations.
By having syntax that nobody except him would implement! Genius!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 12:01

>>9
That and the fuckton of libraries.
I read this wrong or are you talking about FIOC? Because that fucking piece of shit doesn't even have a library for handling images (you know, reading a image, drawing a few lines or some text over it, resizing it, saving it...)

And no, PIL doesn't count, it is separate and sorta abandoned.

Heck, they even removed SGMLParser in 3.0, fucking Beautiful Soup in the process.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 12:31

>>11
As if Haskell can do any better.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-06 13:12

>>11
Well there didn't seem to be sufficient interest for PEP 368, though it looks like a reasonable proposal.
PIL most certainly counts, though. It's the de facto standard, and no one said anything about the standard library.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 1:14

You doubt Python,infidels?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILg-8AMakZ4

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 1:20

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 5:20

What the hell kind of programming language would a rabbit represent, anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 5:39

>>16
a gay jumping one.

hmm, basic?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 7:17

>>16
plan 9

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !tQq1sLlmuk 2009-10-07 7:21

cOCKMOCK BITCHTENNIS PENISMAN

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !tQq1sLlmuk 2009-10-07 7:22

i PROMESI TO YUO THIS MESSEGA IS NOT AUTOMETAD.

Name: TRUE TRUTH EXPERT !tQq1sLlmuk 2009-10-07 7:22

lol!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 14:10

>>11
Beautiful Soup
just use lxml

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 18:52

>>9
That and the fuckton of libraries.
Oh, are they going to be plumbers, not programmers?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 20:06

>>23
Wizards and libraries go together.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 20:21

>>24
Their own libraries, not the public library next to the post office.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 20:24

>>23
I'm not sure how libraries have to do with plumbing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 20:25

>>26
full of shit

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-07 21:18

>>27
I read your post 5 times and laughed each time, progressively harder.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-08 4:20

>>28
I'd laugh too at his post if it weren't for you pointing it out. thanks asshole

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-19 5:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-21 9:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:00

<-- check em dubz

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List