/prog/ - blog — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:08

one of you bastards should make a blog.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:10

No.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:14

Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

You mean like Xarn, Christopher and Taro?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

i have a blog :3

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:47

>>4
I wish Taro didn't end his blog ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:58

>>6
Me too ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:59

You mean like the one among us who's responsible for http://blog.desudesudesu.org/ ?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:12

Rimmus has a blog. Although he's a little bit fanatical.
http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms
Linux Tarballs too.
http://torvalds-family.blogspot.com/
So does Theo.
http://deraadt.livejournal.com/

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:17

>>9
Guido van No-tailcall-optimization has a blog,

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 12:07

>>10
Totaly loling at the name :)

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 16:57

Guido van I-dont-get-foldr

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:22

The Sussman wrote SICP
SICP uses Lisp
Lisp has car
A car is a 3 letter automobile

Guido van Rossum's middle name is "van"
A van is a 3 letter automobile

Coincidence; I think not.
The Sussman and Guido are one and the same.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:33

>>9
Even Tarballs tells it like it is:

I don't quite know why I wasted that much time on something as trivial as SHA1 hashing, but it was kind of fun in a "let's use the compiler as a glorified assembler" kind of way. Some people seem to think that C is a real programming language, but they are sadly mistaken. It really is about writing almost-portable assembly language, and it turns out that getting good results from SHA1 really is mostly about trying to fight the compilers tendency to try to be clever.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:22

>>13

31 + 1(Jan) + 60(1960) = 92 //Birthday

92 + 01 /* 2001, the year he won the Award for the Advancement of Free Software */ = 93

(93 - 3) / 3 = 20

9 + 11 = 20

Guido did 911. There is no doubt in my mind.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:34

>>15
(93 - 3) / 3 = 20

DOES NOT COMPUTE!

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:43

>>16
errr, did i say 93? i meant 63!
just flip the 9 over

Name: 2010-09-08 20:50

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:

Entire Thread Thread List

blog

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:08

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:10

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:14

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:47

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:58

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:12

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:17

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 12:07

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 16:57

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:22

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:33

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:22

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:34

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:43

18 Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-09-08 20:50

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:08

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:10

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:14

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 10:59

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 11:17

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 12:07

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 16:57

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:22

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 17:33

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:22

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-04 19:43

Name: 2010-09-08 20:50