Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Haskellfag

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:14

Dear /prog/, just read my story.

I'm what you'd call a busy man: university classes to follow, huge amount of stuff to learn, a master degree to achieve, and (obviously) teachers are dumb as fuck... So I tought to myself: hat's better than learning a functional language just to make some experiments?

Yes, maybe you will start arguing on how dumb functional language are, and how difficult is using it for a non-teorical purpose, but I need to work with hands on, so that's it.

I already studied OCaml in my bachelor days, but I basically forgot it... Some days ago I've downloaded and installed the Hugs interpreter, and now I'm throwing some spare time (if any) on Haskell.

Now you can insult me.

Tl;dr: you can insult me.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:17

Learn to ask questions properly first.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:19

>>2
It's not a question. It's my story. True story.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:19

is your keyboard broken?
there seems to be missing letters from your post. it's rather distracting

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:20

Why? Haskell seems like a nice language, but it appears a bit restrictive with its type system. I know O'Caml as well, but my current favorite language is Common Lisp. Maybe one day I'll go and learn Haskell in detail, but for now, I have plenty of other things to code, and the language I'm using is very useful in helping me solve my problems.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:28

non-teorical
What horrid cross-languaging was that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:32

>>6
Nothing, Imma just tired and I'm not able to write today

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:33

Don't use Hugs, it's shit. Use GHCi instead.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:47

Now you can insult me.
Learn to write you fuckwit

maybe you will start arguing on how dumb functional language are
Has never been on /prog/ before

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:49

>>9
has now

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 11:58

>>9
There's a couple of idiots arguing against any functional languages(pure or not), but I don't see any reason to pay much attention to them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 12:02

>>11
Pay THIS ** grabs dick **

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 12:23

>>12

The variable GRABS is unbound.
   [Condition of type UNBOUND-VARIABLE]

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:04

functional languages

*snerk*

more like TOY languages

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:08

>>14
Well, I do like toys. Toys are lots of fun. I even browse /toy/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:11

WAKE UP SHEEPLE AND ALL THAT

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:13

Haskellfag
EPIC FAILFAG GTFO NIGGERFAG

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:13

>>17

Fag latin

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:15

>>18
epic win is epic

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 14:44

>>18


phrase = raw_input(">>").split(" ")
frasephag = []

for word in phrase:
    frasephag.append("f" + word[1:] + word[0:1] + "ag")   

frasephag = " ".join(frasephag)
print frasephag

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 15:21

>>1
downloaded and installed Hugs
Wait, what?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 15:24

>>21

fownloadeddag fndaag fnstallediag fugsHag

Wait, what?

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 15:44

>>22
Fag latin rocks.

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 16:03

>>22

*
"FGRUNNERAG"
;

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 16:18

>>24
I believe you meant ,,Frunnergag''

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-02 23:51

>>25
I believe you meant \"fRUNNURGag\".

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-03 0:51

fIag felievebag fouyag feantmag <<fRUNNERGagfag>>

Name: Anonymous 2009-10-03 0:56

*grabs GRUNNUR*

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-23 3:57

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-21 18:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:17

<-- check em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:30

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List