Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Thread Eliminator

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:32

Just a thought. What if you wanted to eliminate a thread? A program could bump 50 posts below the target thread(starting from the thread 50 below), then one by one bump each thread above it and stop after it bumps the thread that was at the top to begin with(as long as the target thread wasn't at the top to begin with). Now the threads would be in perfect order except the target thread would be 50 threads lower than it was before.

If only there was an easy way to program this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:35

one bump each thread above it
I meant to say above the target thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:36

>>1
We would need someone who has reached satori to program this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:36

If only there was an easy way to program this.
There is, and if some idiot like you abuses this the board software will soon be modified to take care of this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:37

you suck don't post your ideas!

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 16:59

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 17:12

>>4
Correct me if im wrong, but wouldnt that be a good thing?

Name: The Sussman 2009-09-29 17:20

So when can I expect the binaries?

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 17:20

>>7
Yes, you're wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 17:23

TID=1254256373; curl -s -r 0-10000 http://dis.4chan.org/prog/subject.txt | awk -F"<>" '{print $4}' | head -n51 | grep -v $TID | perl -e 'print reverse <>' | xargs -n1 ./bump

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 17:35

>>9

He asked you to correct him, not tell him he was.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 19:52

OP, you remind me of a faggot who used to spam /prog/ on a semi-regular basis.
please kill yourself you worthless little shit

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 20:36

>>7
No you are right. We need better board software.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 20:38

>>13
if you want that kind of up-voting/down-voting faggotry then go to digg.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-29 20:40

>>1,1337
What about ;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 0:42

>>14
not what im talking about

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-30 1:36

even if you sent them through 50 proxies to avoid flood detection, for your trick to be effective they'd pretty much have to be simultaneous, and that's a dead giveaway. proxies banned?

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 20:16



     _ ,ヘ_,. --──- 、    /  /   | ``
   く `ヽゝ!_,..--─- 、 ヽ、 / /     !__ノ
   ,.'くゝィ'´    ,  、 ヽ、ヽ.          つ
  ,'  !/  /  ハ  ハ_, ! ', !       十
  i  ,' , /!ゝ、! L.!rト!_ハ_」」   i  ヽ,  └‐、
  !.  Lハ_!イr_,j  └' ! |    レ     --'
  .! i ! ! "  ,.-‐、 .从|      つ    や
   ヽハヘハヽ、 !___ノイ/     -─ァ   _i_  、、    
     , '⌒ヽ!ヘ}><{`ヽ  、    (_ .  | `!ヽ
    !  ___,.〉 Y !_r〉      十___   ' _ノ
    /ヘr'´ ヽ. ! ,イ |   \  / 、___

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List