I'm noticing that prog posters differ in the use of an extra newline after quoting a previous poster. I propose a standardized method of quoting, which we should attempt to come to some sort of agreement on, arguing for and against.
ANATHESIZE IN THE MORNING, FUCK ROOS IN THE EVENING AND WANKFIGHT WITH LINUS INTO THE NIGHT
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 5:34
>>11
I find it interesting that the only browser to correctly render your spoiler among Opera 10.0, Firefox 3.0.9, Google Chrome 3.0.195.21 and IE 6.0 is IE, lol.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 5:40
>>17
You're using ``correctly'' in different meaning than the rest of us usually do.
Like newlines after post references, this is a great way for idiots to self-label. Newlines after references mark imageboard users, newlines after quotations mark Reddit users.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 5:49
wat? this: >>20 what the hell are you snorting? is much less readable than: >>20
what the hell are you snorting?
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 5:56
#include<stdio.h> main() { for(;;){ printf("This is how all code should be indented on /prog/"); } }
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-23 5:57
>>18
No. This is the correct way to render it. Inky blackness is supposed to enshroud the entire contents of the spoiler tag.