Is there no end to RMS's trolling?

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Sep-10.html

I hope that I can last more on this foundation than I lasted at the FSF, where I was removed by RMS after refusing to be an active part of the campaign to rename Linux as GNU/Linux.

RMS Marx Stalin, you never cease to amaze me.

>>79
Which one? Here is a video of Stallman eating something nasty from his foot and drinking it with Pepsi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I25UeVXrEHQ

That is about Open Source version of McDonalds...

Then Stallman personally attacked Gosling for no good reason
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-kth.html
My later dealings with him personally showed that he was every bit as cowardly and despicable as you would expect from that history.

>>78
I don't have to read the parts irrelevant to my architecture.  Besides, I can just use tcc or clang.

Linux and UNIX™ culture in general is very flawed. They worship ASCII text files because they're ``simple''. Look on Github or SourceForge and you'll see endless ``le epic C utility'' that has no GUI, segfaults in all-but-ideal cases, and is often quite slow since most of these ``hackers'' don't know anything about algorithms or how to design software other than ``use C cuz itz fast''. This is borne of the cancer that is UNIX™. It's like their IQs are too low for anything slightly more complicated and actually effective.

>>83
Who needs more than 2048 characters on a line? Let it segfault!

>>83
I agree.  But until SussmanOS comes along, it's ,,good enough'' because, hey, at least it's not closed-source backdoored Microsoft shit.

>>85
http://losethos.com

>>86
No network drivers.

>>67,68
It's even worse than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EGCS#EGCS_fork

>>83
Stop reading Xah Lee.

>>84
Ur a little getser.

>>84
We sophisticated C programmers don't tolerate your kind.

sophisticated C
Oh great! Yet another variant.

>>83
LESS IS MORE.

IF ``FETCH DOG'' DOESN'T FOR ALL DOGS, YOU ARE FETCHING WRONG. FIX FETCHING. DON'T COMPLAIN ABOUT MY PROGRAM.