Asstronaughts and Buckers
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 20:49
1.) In the event of an alien attack, does the human race deserve to wiped out?
2
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-09 20:52
I would like a C option that does not involve the naturalistic fallacy.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 21:08
>>2
I don't think you understand what a naturalistic fallacy is.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 21:16
i think they're both pretty shitty choices.
5
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-09 21:17
I don't think you understand what a [m] /prog/ troll[/m is.
I don't think you understand what a /prog/ troll is.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 21:24
I don't think you understand what BB Code
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 21:51
>>3
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy]I don't think you do.[/url]
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 21:51
10
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-09 21:58
Deserve is more of a moral idea and less of a scientific idea.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 22:00
>>4
You can just estimate
12
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-09 22:18
>>11
no, i can't.
do you have any idea how incredibly large the universe is? and how little we know about it?
13
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-09 22:41
>>10
And Heaven forfend that we should have a scientific approach to morality and ethics.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-09 23:03
>>12
Drake's equation?
Don't be a ninny about a hypothetical exercise.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-10 1:13
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-10 13:16
I for one welcome our new alien overlords.
17
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-10 16:06
>>13
By saying that it's more of a moral idea, I meant that it's purely opinion based.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-10 19:27
>>17
Yes, but you can form rational opinions and back them up
Well, maybe
you can't, but . . .
19
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-10 21:39
>>18
I would like to hear a rational argument for why the human race deserves to be wiped out.
Please no hippy bullshit.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-11 23:57
>>19
Can you a rational argument for why it deserves not to be?
That's the essential idea.
No hippy bull-shit, please.