Java is Sexist

BECAUSE JAVA TREATS WOMEN LIKE OBJECTS


public static void main(String Beans[])
{
     Woman MySandwichMaker = new Woman(null, null, null, asian);
     MySandwichMaker.BakeMeASandwich("naked");
}

>>2
Have you ever heard about Java's coding conventions?



public static void main(String Beans[])
{
     Woman mySandwichMaker = new Woman(null, null, null,
                                       Woman.asian);
     mySandwichMaker.bakeMeASandwich("naked");
}

inb4final const static string asian = "ASIAN";etc

>>3
Well, I guess I'm just not ENTERPRIZE enough.

>>5
Neither is >>3 really.
Woman.asian
Constants should be all upper cased.
.bakeMeASandwich
The method is not parametized to accept a "me", nor is it clear what "me" is in this context. If the women has a private partner variable then the method should be "bakePartnerASandiwch", however I can see no use of a setter to set such a variable.
"naked"
Nothing, especially strings, should be used to externalize type information outside the class. It would be extremely poor style to then, inside that method, have:
if(method == "naked") { ... }
else if(method == "fast" { ... }
else if(method == "kneeling" { ... }
...
What you should be doing is creating an abstract SandwichMaker class that extends woman, then subclass it with different types of sandwichmakers, NakedSandwichMaker, ClothedSandwichMaker. Similarly, women are an extremely common occurrence so you may wish to ease woman creation for other programmers with a WomanFactory.

>>3
And I quoth, "Coding Conventions"
[quote]String Beans[][/quote]

What you should be doing is creating an abstract SandwichMaker class that extends woman, then subclass it with different types of sandwichmakers, NakedSandwichMaker, ClothedSandwichMaker. Similarly, women are an extremely common occurrence so you may wish to ease woman creation for other programmers with a WomanFactory.
If you'll excuse me gentleman, I'm off to join the Enterprise

>>8
Beam him up, Scotty.

>>9
Aye, but ai seem ta be havin' a wee bit o' a problem with the Matter Assembler...

>>10
What you should be doing is creating an abstract Matter Assembler class that extends Matter, then subclass it with different types of matter assemblers, RawMatterAssembler, AntiMatterAssembler. You may also wish to ease Matter Assembler creation for other programmers with a MatterAssemblerFactory.

>>11
Damn it, Jim. I'm a Doctor, not an ENTERPRISE QUALITY DEVELOPER

>>12
lol!

>>8,11
ENTERPRISE CAPS CONVENTION states that the first word needs to be all small and all words after start with a single capital letter.
javaProgrammer
enterpriseConvention
haxusTheFaggot

>>14
no, that's haskellCase.

>>14
shitCase.

How the fuck do you BAKE A SANDWICH anyway?

>>17
Mmm, baked and buttsorted sandwich.

>>17
Good question I would like to know the answer to this.

Good question I would like to know the answer to this.
10 minutes at 350 degrees or until the cheese melts
how fucking hard is that you morons

$ sudo make me a sandwich
Okay.

>>21
back to /xkcd/, rand(all)

>>21
xD

[spoiler]    =)    [/soiler]

>>24
You soiled little brat

>>21,23
               _                         _                                                       _          _      _            ____
 ___ _   _  __| | ___    _ __ ___   __ _| | _____   _ __ ___   ___    __ _   ___  __ _ _ __   __| |_      _(_) ___| |__   __  _|  _ \
/ __| | | |/ _` |/ _ \  | '_ ` _ \ / _` | |/ / _ \ | '_ ` _ \ / _ \  / _` | / __|/ _` | '_ \ / _` \ \ /\ / / |/ __| '_ \  \ \/ / | | |
\__ \ |_| | (_| | (_) | | | | | | | (_| |   <  __/ | | | | | |  __/ | (_| | \__ \ (_| | | | | (_| |\ V  V /| | (__| | | |  >  <| |_| |
|___/\__,_|\__,_|\___/  |_| |_| |_|\__,_|_|\_\___| |_| |_| |_|\___|  \__,_| |___/\__,_|_| |_|\__,_| \_/\_/ |_|\___|_| |_| /_/\_\____/