* What must be done about the ``tweet'' guy?
* How can we get everyone to ignore FrozenVoid.
* U MENA HASKAL, meme or not?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 14:36
What must be done about the ``tweet'' guy?
Wordfilter and ban.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 14:37
``tweet'' guy: Ignore him.
FrozenVoid: The greecemonkey script
U MENA HASKAL: I mena haskal :(
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 14:42
I knew this thread was coming. What of the influx of racists and bigots that have invaded our beloved [spoiler/prog/[/spoiler]? Certainly the Sussman would frown upon such shenanigans.
* What must be done about the ``tweet'' guy?
I concur with >>2 * How can we get everyone to ignore FrozenVoid.
Perhaps a /prog/ wiki is in order? /lounge/ with its own wiki seems to have helped that board a bit. * U MENA HASKAL, meme or not?
I have no objection to that.
>>1 * U MENA HASKAL, meme or not?
It was automatically a meme as soon as UMH Dickface (or whatever he calls himself) made his stupid post. And it's obviously viral since people keep using it. The important question is whether it harms or helps /prog/'s culture. Honestly I haven't seen people using it in egregiously retarded ways, and it's fun sometimes to watch it mutate. I think the "This is 4chan, and on 4chan we call them naggers" bullshit deserves a much higher priority, because whoever keeps posting it is derailing a lot of threads.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 14:54
>>4 Forgets where he is. 4Chan was made from racists and bigots. Save your political correctness for Real Life(tm).
>>7
Actually the guy that keeps "correcting" every usage of the word niggers is derailing your threads by introducing off topic and extraneous bullshit.
>>8
It was founded on weeaboo, which arguably counts as racism, but /b/ and /r9k/ are where the bigotry really thrives. The rest of the boards don't really have any more of it than you see on a daily basis watching TV: It's still noticeable if you're a politically correct cannibalhumanitarian wanker who actually cares about this shit, but it's not glued to your windshield with human feces.
Right now, there is racism and bigotry glued to /prog/'s windshield. And we cannot steer.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:02
>>11
I have a theory that they're the same person.
It's "only a theory".
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:02
>>14
So why does that one fresh fool feel compelled to correct people when someone casually says niggers in a post.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:02
>>1 * How can we get everyone to ignore FrozenVoid.
Here's how I do it.
// ==UserScript==
// @name /prog/ betterer
// @namespace Anonymous
// @description Block FrozenVoid's faggotry.
// @include http://dis.4chan.org/*;
// ==/UserScript==
var posts = document.getElementsByClassName("post");
var count = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < posts.length; i++) {
if (posts[i].getElementsByClassName("postertrip")[0].innerHTML.indexOf("!frozEn/KIg") != -1) {
var post = posts[i];
post.parentNode.removeChild(post);
i--;
count++;
}
}
tweet@1 i'm not a tweet guy or w/e you think. the tweet is from twitter.
its just like private message@NUMBER and public message@@ALL
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:11
>>22 So trying to restrict someone freedom of speech (in choice of words) is more important than the content of the board.
No but people can post all about that in /newpol/ I don't understand why they have to come into /prog/ and do that. And people from /newpol/ have been complaining that there's not enough people posting on that board and that it's slow.
Use of BBCode faggotry on this board is of epic proportions.
It doesn't prove you know how to program or much of anything really. It's just retarded use of tags for the use of tags sake.
>>31
You're a hater. And BBCODE is awesome. And it's implemented in Shiitchan, so why not use it? What? Just let it sit there and collect digital dust? pfft!
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:21
>>31
That's always been that way, as far as I know.
No I'm the same old time thats been giving you shit for forever. Especially about such idiocy.
And if >>33 had been here long enough he'd have known that isn't so.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:27
>>36
Poor baby got his wittle feelingeses hurt being called out with the truth.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:29
tweet@>> test abcabcabcabcbabcabcabcabcabcbabcabcabcabcabcbabc
>> can you link to entire thread with >>soemthing?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:37
BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE BLACK PEOPLE v
>>- works for entire thread >>0 works for entire thread >>, works for entire thread
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:41
Hey guys, let's just all toke up with the Sussman, the Abelson, the Stallman, Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, Donald Knuth, ect. And just reeeeeeeeeeelaaaaaaaaaaaax /prog/.
Sounds great, after work I'll match you rips in the parking lot yeah?
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:44
Dennis Ritchie > Geroldo Sussman.
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:44
>>56 people here don't like to be tweet@ but linking is ok
Name:
Anonymous2009-08-07 15:44
I hate to say this, but we've turned into /jp/. Look at our reactions to a few shitty little trolls. I am ashamed of my reactions to that one /b/tard who has been separated from his hivemind and I hope you all are as well. If he wants to be gratuitously racist and ignore the social norms of the board, let him, I no longer give a shit . The tweet guy is moderately amusing if only for the absurdity of it all. FV is a continual pain in the ass, but we all have the appropriate ointment. I approve of UMH for meme status, if only for the memesmiths hilariously reaction to it all.
THIS JUST IN
Make /prog/ better in three steps.
1. Do not reply to FV's posts.
2. Do not reply to the guy from old /b/'s posts.
3. Do not fucking reply to these posts. FAQ
Q: Why should I ignore them?
A: They thrive on your attention. By not granting them any, they become weaker (thought they will not perish completely).
Q: But they are wrong, I have to correct them!
A: They might be wrong, but they are made by the kind of people that will never admit to being wrong.
>>1 meme or not?
Oh, you're asking now? That's a new low. Wait, is that even you? Or did he finally trick somebody, after like two years? Nah, it's you all right.