>>33
You're just replying with non sequiturs, aren't you?
How is the fact that x86 doesn't support virtualization of itself very well related to what I said on
>>32 ?
Since you like quoting from that article so much,
A virtual machine was originally defined by Popek and Goldberg as "an efficient, isolated duplicate of a real machine". Current use includes virtual machines which have no direct correspondence to any real hardware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulator
An emulator duplicates the functions of one system using a different system, so that the second system behaves like the first system.