Imagine

How productive /prog/ could be if you all cooperated on software projects.
Sharing headers/tips/code snippets, rewriting and optimizing each others code.

What makes you think any of us can program?

We've tried writing software before. It was always in C, and usually involved printfing some current meme before returning EXIT_FAILURE, or two people posted conflicting lines that would never compile.

The problem is that more than one person works on one module at the same time, and that this is /prog/, so people will troll. I can't think of any serious /prog/ cooperative coding effort except ANONIX, and we know how that turned out.

>>3 tried writing software except you didn't actually planned for it.
1.No concrete goals 2. No shared values 3. No standards.
You have to have a clear picture in your(and everyone's) mind and without a plan your open sores project is pipe dream.


____________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
As Shakespeare himself knew, the peace, the reconciliation that he created on the stage would not last an hour on the street.

>>4 No. Allowing one person complete control over a module is stupid.
Everyone should work on one module, until it compiles and executes(in skeleton system work begins on core modules gradually extending functions to periphery) according to previously agreed upon targets/pseudocode/plans. The the entire group moves on second module and process repeats ad infinitum.  Everyone has ability to review the entire code and spot trolling.

___________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
It doesn't matter how you feel inside, you know. It's what shows up on the surface that counts.

>>6 No. Modules aren't all multi-file like your ENTERPRISE-LEVEL completely unindented Javascript codewanks. Allowing more than one person to work on a file is retarded.

>>7 I call this method "wikicoding"


________________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
There are periods in the life of human society when revolution becomes an imperative necessity, when it proclaims itself as inevitable.

>>8
I call it ´´version control''.

>>9 Well, history will show which method will be more successful long-term.
As for now i cannot envision getting productive code out of mostly hostile collaborators without resorting to these methods.
I wonder how would it be if i programmed my game collaboratively(if only /prog/ didn't hate games) with a forum.
I bet i could achieve much much more then >>3

__________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Never hate your enemies. It clouds your judgment.

>>10
Please lurk before posting.

>>11 What are you hinting at?



______________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
That social order and control, structure of governance, social cohesion in states or organizations larger than face-to- face society depends on the nature of the technology of memory--both how it works and what it remembers... In short, what societies value is what they memorize, and how they memorize it, and who has access to its memorized form determines the structure of power that the society represents and acts from.

>>10
History has already proven you wrong on several counts.

>>12 Please see thread 1247945477.

>>13 This ``history' hasn't ended and it definitely didn't include me. 


_______________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
There are periods in the life of human society when revolution becomes an imperative necessity, when it proclaims itself as inevitable.

>>14 This thread is irrelevant to wikicoding.



_____________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Some would ask, how could a perfect God create a universe filled with so much that is evil. They have missed a greater conundrum: why would a perfect God create a universe at all?

>>16
Specifically post 14, then. And stop calling it that.

>>17 I sometimes interchange this/that,
its how i learned english at first and i'm unlikely relearn it the right way(this isnt important to me).



__________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Leave no stone unturned.

>>17 (i'll explain why this interchange happens)
In the sentence "This thread..." i refer to direct object of which i'm thinking. Calling its "That thread..." and referring to thread mentioned there in >>14 seemed kinda awkward and remote(though more "correct", and i would would probably fix that if i was typing a longer post).



____________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
The knowable world is incomplete if seen from any one point of view, incoherent if seen from all points of view at once, and empty if seen from nowhere in particular

Why do you never use sage?

>>20 I use sage in these circumstances:
1.I want to post in this thread.
2.I want to express disapproval of this thread by not bumping it.
3.I don't intend to post multiple times in this thread.

______________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
The knowable world is incomplete if seen from any one point of view, incoherent if seen from all points of view at once, and empty if seen from nowhere in particular.

>>21
1. Right. Isn't that a given?
2. You clearly don't understand the intended use of sage.
3. Double-posting without sage is incredibly bad manners.

May I suggest adopting these circumstantial rules instead?

1. I don't really want to post in this thread, but I will anyway, just to see if there's any more life in it.
2. I want to make it known that I don't feel my post is worthy enough to warrant bumping the thread (in case an F5er gets annoyed at me because they thought there was more interesting and useful material to read, instead it was just a crap post that was possibly also a troll).
3. I'm responding to someone who used sage.

>>4
Anonix, or anoncoreutils at least, got to slightly over halfway before everyone lost interest.

Are you are implying any of you incompetent losers could possibly optimize MY code?

>>23
much longer than SatoriSubs anyway, I think I subbed half of 2B then decided ``Fuck It!''

>>22 Cute but idiotic.
>>24 with supervision and control, possibly. At least you will get fresh ideas.


______________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
There are periods in the life of human society when revolution becomes an imperative necessity, when it proclaims itself as inevitable.

>>26 ..supervision and control. Hmm, I suppose that could work with my game.



_______________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
The facts we see depend on where we are placed and the habits of our eyes.

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List