I'm learning Japanese and I was wondering if there have been any attempts at localizing the C++ language for speakers of Japanese, i.e. translate all keywords into Japanese. Is there such a compiler out there that will accept 'Japanese C++' instead of 'English C++'?
I would personally prefer a Japanese Fjölnir implementation。
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-06 18:06
when the computer crashed and wrote gibberish into the bitmap, the result was something that looked vaguely like static on a broken television set — a 'snow crash'
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┒
│ ◕ ◕ ┃
│ REASON ┃
│ Version 1.0B7 ┃
│ Gatling type 3 mm hypervelocity railgun system ┃
│ Ng Security Industries, Inc. ┃
│ PRERELEASE VERSION-NOT FOR FIELD USE ┃
│ DO NOT TEST IN A POPULATED AREA ┃
│ -ULTIMA RATIO REGUM- ┃
│ ◕ ◕ ┃
┕━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
I'm sure Anonix will have Japanese Mode in its C++ compiler.
Name:
FrozenVoid2009-07-07 3:19
English is the standard. It would make sense if developer of C++ was japanese or very fluent in the language, but why
complicate matters with current widely accepted code? Even if the compilers support it, programmers wouldn't want to learn a new language every time some smartass decided to add "native localization support" into the language they work with.
__________________________________________ http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Some would ask, how could a perfect God create a universe filled with so much that is evil. They have missed a greater conundrum: why would a perfect God create a universe at all?
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-07 4:04
>>20 出力書式
I lol'd slightly, since 「出力」can be read as "with great force".
>>25
Why shouldn't programming languages have "native localization support"? If implemented correctly, it would be a purely mechanical process of turning keywords in one language into keywords in another. I've downloaded Sepples code in which all of the comments and variables were in Czech. It wasn't pretty, and I couldn't understand it, but it still compiled.
>>29 If implemented correctly, it would be a purely mechanical process of turning keywords in one language into keywords in another.
Why don't you implement it, then? I mean, go and write it. I mean, go.