Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

LISP AND JAVA HAD SEX

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 1:25

HERE IS THE CHILD
http://clojure.org/

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 1:28

digusting.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 2:00

an efficient and robust
Stopped reading right there.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 2:41

Sage for Java. And RISPU.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 4:35

Too old.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 9:35

Combining Lisp and Java is like combining AIDS and Cancer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 9:39

>>6
insinuation Lisp is either AIDS or a Cancer
:(

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 9:44

>>7
Maybe he meant Java is both AIDS and Cancer

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 9:45

>>8
now I'm happy again :)

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 9:57

>>9

But it's a comparison of combinations
Otherwise, why not just say ,,Java is like combining AIDS and Cancer``

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 10:13

>>10
Maybe Java alone is AIDS, but trying to combine it with something is AIDS and Cancer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 10:19

>>10
Or maybe he structured his sentence like:
Combining Lisp && (Java is like combining AIDS and Cancer).

Name: FrozenVoid 2009-07-03 11:00

“The Lisp language provides great generality by default but this comes at a grave cost in terms of performance. In order to get within an order of magnitude of the performance of C++, OCaml or SML, it is necessary to litter the source code with type declarations. In contrast, this process is automated by Stalin, ocamlopt, MLton and SML/NJ. The shortest Lisp implementation demonstrates the abysmal performance offered by the Lisp language which is also coupled with considerable verbosity: four OCaml and one Standard ML implementations are both shorter and much faster than the shortest Lisp.”



_______________________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
The knowable world is incomplete if seen from any one point of view, incoherent if seen from all points of view at once, and empty if seen from nowhere in particular.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 11:09

“The Javascript language provides great generality by default but this comes at a grave cost in terms of performance. In order to get within an order of magnitude of the performance of Lisp, Scheme or Closure, it is necessary to litter the source code with type declarations. In contrast, this process is automated by Stalin, ocamlopt, MLton and SML/NJ. The shortest Lisp implementation demonstrates the abysmal performance offered by the Javascript language which is also coupled with considerable verbosity: four OCaml and one Standard ML implementations are both shorter and much faster than the shortest Javascript.”

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-03 13:00

>>12
Nice reality distortion field, Christopher.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 14:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:11


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List