Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Oh dear... please God, this is not true!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 9:06

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 9:10

Lame

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 9:16


WALL OF TEXT
No thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 9:17

>>3
BLINKING TEXT HOW DO I DO THIS

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 9:35

>>4
NO

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 10:15

>>4
use the [blink] tag!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 10:41

If only it was scalable. It could have become turnkey Enterprise solution.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 18:03

Eh, what DBMS are they using? I know oracle won't save any changes unless you manually commit. Doing a rollback would have undid his delete and brought him to the last commit point.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 18:07

>>8
Microsoft SQL Server Express Edition, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 19:00

>>8
would have undid
Jesus fuckniggering Christ.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 20:43

>>10
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/undid
2) to make of no effect or as if not done : make null : reverse
Though I suspect Eyehibbit by a cunning troll. Well played.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 21:00

>>11
It's a word, but it`s in the wrong tense. It should have been would have undone.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 21:26

>>12
How is it in the wrong tense? Using the definition in >>11:
Doing a rollback would have "made null" his delete...

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 21:29

>>8
The people on thedailywtf.com hate Oracle for some reason. They've even got an "I hate Oracle" club.
http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/17.aspx

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 22:41

>>13
lrn2pastparticiple
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 23:16

lol, i'm no programmer but even i know they should have just went to edit and undo.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-29 23:46

>>16
I lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 0:07

>>17
I lol'd at the thought of you lol'ling :)

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 1:05

>>14
There's pretty good reason to hate it. I've only been messing with it for 2 months now and it's bullshit all the problems it has. Might as well just go with an open source alternative that doesn't cost your soul

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 4:40

>>6
[blink]hurrrrrrrrrrrrr[/blink]

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 4:43

>>15
learn to subjunctive mood

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 5:19

>>21
If only subjunctive mood were relevant to the past participle...

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 5:20

Also...
>>16
should have just went
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 8:27

>>22
stop trolling. the clause occured after a WOULD, and has never actually occured in the past.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 12:44

>>24
EXPERT GRAMMARIAN

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-30 12:47

>>22
LRN2COUNTERFACTUAL

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 2:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 6:44


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List