Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Ubuntu eating my disk

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 9:04

[ROBERT@hsp:~] df /dev/sda2
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2             46442536  33489000  10594392  76% /
[ROBERT@hsp:~] echo "(46442536 - 33489000 - 10594392)/1024" | bc
2303
[ROBERT@hsp:~]

Where are my two gibibytes of missing disk space?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 9:12

where is /g/?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 9:17

UBUNTU ATE THEM!
INSTALL WINDOWS, QUICK!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 9:28

>>1
Your bytes are in a better place, Robert.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 10:29

Ubantu pantsu

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 11:37

>>1
I would say that it's taken up by the FS's bookkeeping, but I don't really know how much data a FS needs for bookkeeping.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 11:46

Swap~

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 12:38

By default 5% of the disk is reserved for the superuser.
You can get them back by running sudo tune2fs -m 0.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 12:48

>>1
I read it first as Ubuntu eating my dick

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 13:15

>>9
It can't, Linux has terrible Teledildonic support

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 13:44

>>10
There's a python library for that.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 13:55

>>8
WARNING THIS IS AN RM -RF STYLE TROLL

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 14:05

WARNING >>12 IS A META-TROLL

-m reserved-blocks-percentage
    Set the percentage of reserved filesystem blocks.1
____________________
[1] Manpage of TUNE2FS http://www.netadmintools.com/html/tune2fs.man.html

Name: ROBERT 2009-06-09 15:38

Will I get a legit answer please?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 16:10

>>14
Probably not :-P

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 17:13

I read that as Ubuntu eating my dick

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 17:21

>>16
good for u

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 17:22

>>1
gibibytes

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 17:48

an israeli guy at my uni pronounced gigabytes as jiggabytes. we chortled at him.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 17:50

>>19
ONE POINT TWENTY-ONE JIGGABYTES

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 18:09

>>19
That́s a perfectly valid pronunciation, so I dońt know what you were laughing about․

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 18:33

>>19
You guys are so cool! It's so nice to perfectly master several languages, hebrew with no doubt, and make fun of people who are less skilled at the [i]expert[i] pronunciation of completely foreign idioms.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 19:08

>>9
I also. In fact, I can't see how the author could have intended it to be read any other way. I would consider this a very subtle troll, perhaps 8/10.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 19:28

>>22
Are Hebrews [spoiler]any better at BBCode?[/spoier]

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-09 19:41

>>24
I don't know, I'm not jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 0:12

>>23
I can insure you I am not a troll!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 5:06

>>22
fag

Name: ROBERT 2009-06-10 5:11

>>27
say that to my face fucker and not online and see what happens

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 8:37

I read that as Ubuntu eating my dick

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 8:37

>>28
What about your facefucker?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 9:30

>>28
alexis is faggot

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 10:50

>>30
>>31
DONT SEE HIS POSTS

Name: Joe 2009-06-10 10:50

>>28
Hello Robert

Name: George 2009-06-10 10:53

>>28,33
Hey guys I didn't know you came to /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 10:55

>>34
obv. didn't get the reference.....

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 12:05

>>35
DONT SEE HIS POSTS

Name: Mike 2009-06-10 12:07

>>35
YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 12:08

>>36
You seem to be running an anti-namefag script instead of just an anti-FV script. That's not good.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 12:54

>>38
That's not good

citation needed

Name: ROBERT 2009-06-10 13:07

Guys, it's getting off-topic. How can I report it?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 13:07

That's not good
Because they can not help their neighbor.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 13:27

>>40
report it
;-)

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 13:31

>28  Name: ROBERT : 2009-06-10 05:11
>
   >>27
   say that to my face fucker and not online and see what happens
>
>29 Name: Anonymous : 2009-06-10 08:37
>
   I read that as Ubuntu eating my dick
>
>30 Name: Anonymous : 2009-06-10 08:37
>
   >>28
   What about your facefucker?
>
>31 Name: Anonymous : 2009-06-10 09:30
>
   >>28
   alexis is faggot
>
>32 Name: Anonymous : 2009-06-10 10:50
>
   >>30
   >>31
   DONT SEE HIS POSTS
>
>33 Name: Joe : 2009-06-10 10:50
>
   >>28
   Hello Robert
>
>34 Name: George : 2009-06-10 10:53
>
   >>28,33
   Hey guys I didn't know you came to /prog/
>
>35 Name: Anonymous : 2009-06-10 10:55
>
   >>34
   obv. didn't get the reference.....


THE JOKE GUYS IS THAT ERLANG ADVERT. THX.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 13:55

Is there a networking joke I'm missing?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 14:49

>>44
Yes, you could say that. The Internet is a network.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 14:55

I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Unbuntu fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a PC (a Dell Inspiron 1420 w/4 GB of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 1.7 GB file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Mac Pro running 10.5.6, which by all standards should be a lot more expensive than this Dell, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

In addition, during this file transfer, Opera will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even GEdit is straining to keep up as I type this.

I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Linuxen, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen an Ubuntu install that has run faster than its OS X counterpart, despite Linux's open-source architecture. My Mac mini with 256 megs of ram runs faster than this dual-core machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that Linux is a superior OS.

Linux addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Linux over the faster, more expensive, more stable system.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 14:56

>>19
That's how it's meant to be pronounced. Leave it to Americans to not being able to pronounce anything right, ever.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 15:00

>>46
Ubuntu is not representative of all Linux distributions. Try something else, don't follow the herd.Oh wait, your a mac user ;)

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 15:06

>>46
expert kopipe modification

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 15:15

Linux addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Linux over the faster, more expensive, more stable system.
FreeBSD is not more expensive than Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 16:15

>>50
FreeBSD is not more expensive than Linux.

It is, however, the superior web serving platform. Amirite?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 16:58

>>51
It's also superior for pretty much everything else.
Except screen savers that do cute things when your computer falls off your desk... but if that happens often you probably don't care how stable or fast it is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 17:49

>>52
It's also superior for pretty much everything else.
One word, adobe flash support.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 17:55

>>53
and hardware support

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 18:08

>>53
who desires flash support?!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 18:28

>>55

You do have a point, but it's essential for youtube and youtube-like interface porn websites.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 18:37

>>56
It's not. It's trivial to extract the raw video URL, and you can play it with any decent player, with proper fullscreen and seeking support, and at half the CPU cost¹. A correct setup will open a video with just one click, so it's not inconvenient either.
__________
[sup]1 Efficient video playback is possible using Flash, but it requires competent WEB DEVELOPERS and a NON-ENTERPRISE mentality.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 18:38

>>53
Flash runs better on FreeBSD than it does on any other operating system.

>>54
It has better hardware support than linux, especially for laptops.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 18:42

>>58
But can it run my obscure half-scanner/half-toaster from Korea?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 19:08

>>59
For that you want NetBSD.
I didn't know http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2103/2709034589_693dc136b6_o.jpg could mate with http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/screenshots/phl/90988431.jpg, but I'm sure NetBSD will run on the result.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 19:12

>>60
stop giving Rand(all) ideas for his shitty webcomic.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 19:35

>>58
Flash runs better on FreeBSD than it does on any other operating system.

citation needed

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 19:38

I misread the title as ``Ubuntu eating my dick''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 21:08

>>59
It is open-source, therefore you must write the device yourself instead of bitching, you ungrateful twat.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 22:42

>>62
freebsd release notes + wine benchmarks that are trivial to find on google.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-10 23:11

I misread the title as ``Ubuntu reading my SICP''.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List