Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

I'd like to learn a new language

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 8:47

What do you recommend?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 8:50

在mysql中建立一个test数据库,建立cat表
CREATE TABLE `cat` (
  `cat_id` varchar(32) NOT NULL,
  `name` varchar(16) NOT NULL,
  `sex` varchar(1) default NULL,
  `weight` float(9,3) default NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY  (`cat_id`)
)

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 9:19

la lojban

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 9:25

>>2
chinese SQL?
why the hell are the column and table names quote delimited?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 9:25

>>3
NO THANK YOU

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 9:42

German

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 9:56

Programming language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 10:00

>>4
Best practices.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 10:15

>>4
quote
Those aren't quotes...

Name: t help him 2009-06-05 10:45

The languages worth knowing, in terms of productivity and usefulness for screwing around, in no particular order:
[*]Scheme/LISP
[*]Lua
[*]C
[*]Python

Unless you want a job, then you should learn
[*].NET shite
[*]sepples
[*]C

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 10:57

>>10
don't forget COBOL

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 10:57

>>10
I know C and LISP. Do you really think I'd enjoy Lua? How about Haskell?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 11:10

oh and will factor make me write better code?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 11:25

>>12
Haskell is Ruby for functional programming. You can take that any way you want.

Lua is very easy to pick up, and writes a bit like a more-friendly Python (less irritating OO crap) with built-in tail call optimization. It's C interface is a lot nicer, too. For Q&D programs you write for yourself, it can't be beat. Everything is an associative array (table) in Lua, which may be weird at first but accomplishes just about everything you want to do anyway, and metatables give a lot of the benefits of OO without a lot of the overhead.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 11:38

Also Erlang

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 11:48

>>4
CREATE TABLE `cat`
TABLE `cat`
（ ´∀｀）

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 12:34

javaECMAscript

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 12:45

>>17
I've been thinking about javascript. I heard it's actually cool.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 12:55

Portuguese

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 13:21

Factor

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 13:59

>>14
Haskell is Ruby for functional programming. You can take that any way you want.
Could you elaborate on that?

Name: Sage user 2009-06-05 14:40

I use sage.

Name: sah gay 2009-06-05 15:15

>>21
Take it any way you want.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 16:10

>>14
Haskell is Ruby for functional programming.
Could you elaborate on that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 16:16

sage is a programming languach

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 16:24

>>24
You can use it with Textmate. Watch the screencasts.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 16:32

>>14
>Haskell is Ruby
Could you elaborate on that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 16:33

>>27
You can use it with Textmate. Watch the screencasts.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 17:10

>>14
Haskell
Could you elaborate on that?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 17:12

>>19
Portuguese
Just learn Spanish and speak slowly.

Name: sah gay 2009-06-05 17:15

haskell :: FunctionalProgramming -> /prog/trend

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 17:21

>>29,27,24
Could you elaborate on that?
NO!

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 17:53

Haskell is Ruby for functional programming.
Could you elaborate on that? 8-)

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 18:18

>>14
Haskell is Ruby for functional programming. You can take that any way you want.
Never used Ruby myself, but I think I know what you mean - a language for hipster faggots who try to be trendy and fit in.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 18:58

>>1
"GRUNNUR"

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 19:05

>>34
At least with Haskell you don't get the painfully dumb hipster faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 19:17

>>34
I never understood this stereotype about "hipster faggots" using Ruby. Are you referring to the Rails guys, or all Ruby users? I use Ruby because I genuinely believe it's nice, concise langauge for quick and dirty work, not because I want to fit into some clique.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 19:17

>>36
ummmm... I guess you haven't been around haskellers in the last year or so

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 19:19

>>37
Keep telling you'reself that, hipster fag.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 19:20

>>37
People in /prog/ are very jealous of anyone who has a sense of style. They're all neckbeards. Yes, Ruby looks good on my Macbook screen. Deal with it, guys. And I'll tell you something about Starbucks: it's delicious.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 20:17

>>40
You do realize that it's nigh impossible to have a beard without extension to the neck region?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 20:32

>>38
Indeed I didn't. Did I miss something?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 20:42

LOLCode, anybody?

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 20:55

>>42
It's fully possible to have a beard that extends beyond it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-05 21:11

>>44
s/2/1/g

Name: Anonymous 2009-06-06 9:23

bampu

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:57

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -